chrisuk

Joined

• started 10 topics
• posted 150 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by chrisuk

• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  Just to be clear: If I felt I'd said anything that deserved an apology, I would do so straight away. I don't feel that I have said anything to warrent such an action, and, as I've already pointed out; I stand by everything I've said.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  Cofty: Nobody is getting an apology from me. What's the worse that can happen, I get banned? I couldn't careless. I rarely post on the site, I read on here more than anything and no matter what was done, stopping people from visiting this site just to read is impossible. Quick ip change and their back. Anyway I'll not apolagize. I stand by everything I said.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  Possibly both bohm. You seem to be simpathetic toward "mild pedophilia" What are your views on mild rape?
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  Anyway, enjoy the rest of the discussion. For some people here it doesn't matter what Dawkins said they'd defend him. Just as they once defended the WTS. Couldn't possibly be wrong twice?
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  If a governing body member had come out and said what Dawkins has, the very same people defending Dawkins now would be outraged at the WTS. But, Dawkins seems to be some sort of Demi-God to some people, so hey, let him say what he likes.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  The whole paragraph. I don't think he should speak on behalf of everyone who's been abused. bohm, there's always going to be people on both sides of an argument like this. I will never agree with anything Dawkins says in this article. I'm not taking away from his work in other areas, there's no doubt he's brilliant in his chosen field/s, but these comments are wrong.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  The lie? That qoute is even worse “mild pedophilia,” and " Mild racism" Yep, Dawkins is coming off real well here.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  Frankie - I don't think there is such a thing as “mild pedophilia,” Is there also mild rape?

  bohm - Dawkins seems to state that every victim think in the same way he does.
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  bohm - he was talking much more broadly than just his own experiances " In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called “mild pedophilia,”
• 
  320

  Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

  by chrisuk in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  chrisuk

  You say black and white thinkers want everything spelled out, yet you clearly look at psychlogical books or websites for definitions of black and white thinking. Label me all you like, but I judge using my own morals not by using the work of psychologists. That's no better than being told what's right and wrong by the WTS. Given your opinions on child abuse maybe you should consider going back? Maybe become an elder? I'm done with you anyway.