The belief that somehow "going along to get along" is the answer.
Dont folks know, you"appear" to go along until your plan is ready to execute. And then you act!
Geesh, even I know that.
i think that for the most part, dissenting views should be allowed to exist because of free speech principles.
one person may strongly feel that something is true while someone else may present “facts” that support the opposing view.
when that is the case, healthy discussion is mostly productive.
The belief that somehow "going along to get along" is the answer.
Dont folks know, you"appear" to go along until your plan is ready to execute. And then you act!
Geesh, even I know that.
i think that for the most part, dissenting views should be allowed to exist because of free speech principles.
one person may strongly feel that something is true while someone else may present “facts” that support the opposing view.
when that is the case, healthy discussion is mostly productive.
CBS has a show on Sunday mornings called "Full Measure"
The interview this morning was with a whistleblower from Google named Vorhees.
Among other things he said Google runs an algorithm called
"Machine Learning Fairness"
It is an artificial intelligence program thats purpose is to intervene when humans are being "unfair".wether what they are saying is factual or not.
He gave a non-political example of if a person googled "CEO's of companies. What would show up is a huge prorportion of men's photos.
the AI program would deem this unfair and add pictures of women which while not "factual" is believed by Google to be more "fair".
Sundar Pichai CEO of Google testified before Congress that they don't have blacklists
that they don't approach their work with a political viewpoint.
The whistle blower then gave examples of how this is untrue.
Other media giants were mentioned besides Google.
Example: In the early days of the virus, CNN said masks not effective and FaceBook allowed it.
In addition, FB banned ads on the sale of medical masks at that time
FB is spending millions to fund the Fact Checker organizations. Many of these organizations are also anti Trump
"Science Feedback" is an example of one of their fact-checker on Wuhan that was wrong in its data - they were wrong because they used an American scientist who worked in Wuhan as their source.
Another example is given:
Twitter deleted a New York Times expose on Hunter Biden. Jack Dorsey CEO of Twitter declined to be interviewed for this show.
This show is called "FULL MEASURE" and is carried by CBS and hosted by Sharyl Atkisson.
There are more inflammatory things said, such as the whistleblower finally resigned when he realized Google was in fact attempting a coup on the President of the United States.
i think that for the most part, dissenting views should be allowed to exist because of free speech principles.
one person may strongly feel that something is true while someone else may present “facts” that support the opposing view.
when that is the case, healthy discussion is mostly productive.
I have a question. Do any of these social media platforms (twitter, facebook etc) get funding from the government?
i think that for the most part, dissenting views should be allowed to exist because of free speech principles.
one person may strongly feel that something is true while someone else may present “facts” that support the opposing view.
when that is the case, healthy discussion is mostly productive.
This says it well
GregGutfeld
@greggutfeld
·
3h
CNN tries to get FNC banned.
Apple targets Parler.
Publishers dump writers. music labels drop artists.
twitter bans/removes thousands.
tech companies join hands.
this redefines who the true rebels are.
if you like the purge, you're the servant.
i think he will have to deal with the attorney general of new york amongst other things.
i do think he will not simply go away quietly ..
It seems 1984 was a better prophecy than Atlas shrugged
Wonderful references
i think he will have to deal with the attorney general of new york amongst other things.
i do think he will not simply go away quietly ..
Trump's Approval Rating Rises After DC Protests
i think he will have to deal with the attorney general of new york amongst other things.
i do think he will not simply go away quietly ..
Tulsi Gabbard is being somewhat of a Centrist at a time when everyone is jerking the wheel hard left or hard right in a very reactionary way each to the other.
You have to admire the mental discipline it takes to do what she is attempting to do.
for those who think the organization is going more mainstream think again.
so eating a leftover birthday cupcake is as bad a sin as peter betraying jesus!
(see lloyd evans video) .
Didn't they used to say eating leftovers was similar to eating "food sacrificed to idols?
What happened to precipitate them jerking on the leash? Perhaps too many people letting the lines "soften" has created a necessity to bunch the sheep tighter?
i think he will have to deal with the attorney general of new york amongst other things.
i do think he will not simply go away quietly ..
That is a good point Minimus.
This whole thing was winding down and Trump was going to be out of office, replaced by Biden. The problem was Trump wasn't looking as defaced as he needed to for the well planned out narrative which is set to overtake America (and it's not the Democrats folks - it's the Tech-nocrats.)
In fact, he was looking more "Robin Hood-ish" to many of his followers. That could not be allowed. So what to do? The march on Washington by Trump supporters was already going to happen so why not send in the same rioters from the summer riots and the BLM riots? They can blend with the Trump march and do enough damage to shock and permanently ruin Trumps reputation for good.
So that is what happened. The mercenaries walked into the crowd, redirecting to the Capital and we all saw what happened from there.
An appearance will be made to "find" the criminals but it will die out. If anyone is "found" they will be called QAnon. That is why we will see on the news ONLY interviews that support and promote that narrative.
The goal was to A) Remove Trump from office and B) Make sure he is completely discredited so there won't be any threat from him in the future as any kind of leader,
i think he will have to deal with the attorney general of new york amongst other things.
i do think he will not simply go away quietly ..
Thank you Min!
No doubt there were quite a few more than 2...
And which tech billionaire paid for the 2021 version of these mercenaries?