Genesis 3:14 – “Then Jehovah God said to the serpent: “Because
you have done this, you are the cursed one out of all the domestic animals and
out of all the wild animals of the field. On your belly you will go, and you
will eat dust all the days of your life.”
The old GB and GB 2.0 differ on this matter.
Questions from Readers – Watchtower June 1, 1964
“This is the only place in the Bible where any indication is
given that the serpent did not at one time travel on its belly. What is said
here is, of course, directed principally to the invisible spirit creature who
used the literal serpent as his mouthpiece. It foretells his debasement. But
for the symbolic application of this judgment upon the wicked spirit creature
who became Satan to have any force there must be a fulfillment of it in the
literal serpent, which has come to symbolize Satan. It, therefore, is
reasonable to conclude that before God cursed it the serpent possessed legs
that elevated it above the ground. As he had the power to create the serpent in
the first place, God had the power to transform its body so that it ceased to
have legs and was able to move about on its belly.”
Questions from Readers – Watchtower June 15, 2007
“The Bible does not specifically state that the animal used
in tempting Eve had previously had legs but lost them. While the wording of
Genesis 3:14 might lead some to think so, we need not necessarily conclude that
prior to this curse, serpents had legs. Why not?
Principally because the real object of Jehovah’s judgment
was Satan-the invisible spirit who had misused that lowly animal. The Bible describes
Satan as “the father of the lie” and “the original serpent.” Both of these
expressions apparently point back to Satan’s using a visible animal, a serpent,
as his mouthpiece to induce Eve to disobey God’s command. God created serpents,
and Adam had apparently given serpents their name before Satan’s deceptive act.
The unreasoning serpent that spoke to Eve was not to blame. It would have been
unaware that Satan was manipulating it, and it could not understand the
judgement that God rendered against the disobedient parties.”
The next few paragraphs go on to explain that being put on
its belly and eating dust was all symbolic and only applied to Satan’s final
outcome.
Why did they change their view?
Because it is a wild concept and it invites speculation. In
all my years of being a JW I found most Elders and some publishers disapprove of
any speculation beyond the current words of the GB’s in power. If you read C.T.
Russell’s earlier work you'll notice that speculation was encouraged during
his day. That speculation was so deep it got to the point where it was out of
control. The Great Pyramid of Egypt eventually became part God’s plan per
Russell. That idea was thrown to the curb so long ago.
The current trend of leadership in the Society is to be passive
about some of the most interesting subjects in the Bible. All they care about now is to have
control over the members. You have to go to prison, be shunned or even die by
what they write in the literature. It’s so sad it has come to this. They have
put themselves in the Judgment seat of Moses. I believe the nations are going
to act soon on this organization.
For those that still believe in the literal second coming,
speculation is a requirement to piece it all together. The current GB thinking
on this matter is too symbolic and has no literal application. This is just
like their change of heart between the Watchtower June 1, 1964 and Watchtower June
15, 2007.
I am of the opinion that the serpent once had legs before the
curse because the Boa and the Python both have the potential to grow vestigial
organs. These are tiny hind leg bones buried in muscles toward their tail ends.
A serpent with legs is known to be the mythological dragon. Most ancient
cultures believed in the existence of dragons. Every animal on the Chinese
calendar is a real animal, except for the dragon. Why the exception?
I found this topic about serpent limbs mentioned 16 years
ago.
https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/2837/did-snakes-have-legs-yes-no
Thanks for reading,
ACTFTU-Tron 2.0
