cofty
Evolution happened we know this with a level of certainty that is every bit as great as our knowledge that the earth is not flat.
Certainty is no measure of the veracity of a belief. No idea why you'd even mention it.
One can be certain and wrong, uncertain and right.
Why would anybody who already accepts this to be true want to debate whether this belongs in the set of facts or beliefs?
I wasn't debating the issue.
All facts are beliefs. "Facts" and "knowledge" are subsets of belief.
The statement I originally responded to was "Nobody "believes" in natural selection, it's just a fact."
I wasn't debating that point, I was offering correction.
I read the article on epistemology a while ago. It was outrageously tedious.
Seemingly you didn't understand it.
cappytan
Anyone that points to DNA as "proof" of a creator and evidence against evolution has no idea what the science behind evolution actually says. They're being intellectually dishonest.
If they have "no idea what the science behind evolution actually says": They are not being intellectually dishonest. They are just being ignorant or wrong.
To be intellectually dishonest, you have to know that you are in error...
For example:
Someone who is aware that "facts" belong in the catagory of "belief", but who continues to say that "you don't have to believe a fact", would be intellectually dishonest.