"Peace on Earth" international assembly, 1969, Yankee Stadium.
NeonMadman
JoinedPosts by NeonMadman
-
114
What Assembly were you baptized at...
by vilot ini was baptized at the 1976 "sacret secret" dc at inglewood ca there must have been 50,000 people there..
-
-
-
20
Is Identification Mandatory?
by cameo-d inguess bob dylan didn't think so.. apparently, he was "caught" strolling in the city and curious cops wanted to know why he was walking around.. cops then escorted him to his hotel where he had friends who vouched for him.. http://www.abcnews.go.com/us/wirestory?id=8332031.
so my question is....is it illegal to walk on the street without identification?.
if you are without id what are the usual consequences?.
-
-
NeonMadman
Dylan should have told them that he was the previous Bruce Springsteen. :P
-
-
-
NeonMadman
Modalists believe, in essence, that God puts on different "masks" at different times, appearing as Father, Son or Holy Spirit as the occasion demands, but that there is only one Person who is God. Trinitarians believe that there are three distinct Persons who comprise the one Being known as God.
Whether you are Trinitarian depends on how you define your terms. For example, when you say that "the Holy Spirit is God's active spirit with all his qualities," do you include the quality of personality? It does seem hard to imagine that something or someone who has emotions, intellect and will (all of which are attributed to the Holy Spirit in the Bible) could be less than personal. Also, when you say that Jesus is the Son of God, do you mean that in the ontological sense that has been understood by Christians for 2000 years, i.e., that He is God Himself by nature, as the son of a man is human by nature? Or do you understand "Son" as the JW's do, to mean a created being who derives his life from a Father?
JW's often make the mistake of confusing modalism for Trinitarianism, which is why they ask questions like, "whom did Jesus pray to," or "who ran the universe while Jesus was dead for 3 days?" The WTS also has deliberately muddied the issue by referring to the Trinity as a teaching of "three gods." It's no wonder JW's find the doctrine confusing.
-
11
The Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses ACLU 1941
by RR innow before i scan this booklet and make it available, i need to know if it's already out there in the archives and if not, if anyone is interested in it:.
.
the persecution of jehovah's witnesses published by the aclu january 1941.
-
-
NeonMadman
I'm interested. And I've never seen it available.
-
-
-
NeonMadman
A wonderful website!
Do not miss it!
This is what, just ordinary spam? We allow that here now?
-
21
Do you know the real purpose of the Society?
by compound complex inthe following notes on fred franz's conducting of the morning bible discussion [17 november 1979] were taken by a bethelite and later given to ray franz:.
some persons are now talking about reading the bible, that we should read "just the bible.
" well, that's what christendom's churches have been telling the people to do for centuries and look at the mess that's resulted.
-
-
NeonMadman
... Topics must relate to the 19th century "history" theme of this site, and must NOT speak negatively of Jehovah's Witnesses, the Society, or the "Pioneers".
That's going to be pretty hard to do, since the truth about the Society's origins will tend to reflect negatively upon the organization. As they study the history of the Society, are they allowed to mention all the silly teachings and false prophecies?
-
158
Older posters check in...just post your name...we need to hear from you!
by restrangled ini am not the oldest but have 3 years here!
restrangled.. how about you?.
-
-
NeonMadman
Been here since 2001, though I don't post so much anymore.
-
46
Things I learned at the 2009 DC !!!
by tresdecu inunfortunately i had the "flu" friday and saturday.
but i made it to the sunday session to make an apperance.. on sunday, i learned that we are,... ready, this is a new one for me :"...on the doorstep of the great tribulation..." so close brothers!
so close!.
-
-
NeonMadman
>>Also I saw the most hilarious bathroom bros. - Three 'brothers' standing in front of the sis's bathroom. Two holding a sign saying "closed" and one in the middle holding a sign saying "cleaning in progress"
They probably needed to have three guys guarding the door in case any nasty apostates tried to burst into the bathroom and disrupt the important work of Jehovah's organization.
-
16
Do You Have an LP Record Collection?
by compound complex ingreetings, audiophiles:.
i have had my own records - 78s, 45s as well as lps - since the 1950s and was given an entire collection from a private lending library.
i wonder if those never opened are worth $omething .... and you?.
-
-
NeonMadman
I probably have over 1000 LP's in boxes in my cellar. I'd love to take them out and listen to some of them, but they are kinda buried and I have no place to put them if I took them out. It would just be another big mess...
-
30
San Diego Pastor & Wife Told They Can't Have Bible Study Group In Their Home!
by minimus inabout 15 people meet for a bible study in the home of the pastor.
the county has informed him that he cannot have a religious assembly in his home without first applying for a very expernsive permit.. hmmm.
maybe the society took home book studies away for legal reasons.. personally, i think the government has no right to tell people they can't meet up for bible study..
-
-
NeonMadman
ETA: I'm not allowed to run a business out of my home if it generates traffic. Why should my rights to conduct business be less than someone's rights to conduct religious services?
Municipalities generally have zoning laws that restrict businesses. This is so that General Motors can't plop a production plant in the middle of a residential neighborhood so that the residents have to deal with the traffic, pollution, and whatever else it generates. I suppose you could argue the same thing about a large church, but (1) we aren't talking about a large church here, we are talking about a home gathering of 15 or so people; and (2) while religious freedom and freedom of assembly are guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, freedom to conduct business wherever and whenever one desires are not. So, constitutionally at least, I think the freedom to conduct religious services is a freedom of a higher order than that to conduct business.
A government saying, "You can't have large meetings in this building because it's a fire and traffic safety hazard," does not restrict anyone's right to practice their religion.
True enough, although again, I would ask whether other comparable gatherings are being permitted while religious services are being prohibited. If political gatherings, lodge meetings, clubs and societies of various stripes are allowed to meet and religious gatherings are banned, then I think that unconstitutional religious discrimination is being practiced. If NOBODY can have a large meeting in such a building because it is seen as a fire and safety hazard, then fine. Otherwise, the allegation of "fire and safety hazard" is just being used as an excuse to discriminate against religion. And, of course, 15 people gathering in a private home is not a "large meeting" that should be subject to such regulation anyway.
When I worked inpatient psych, people used to pull the Religious Freedom card all the time. They tried to say we had to allow them to do anything done under the guise of religion
Obviously, not everything claimed as a right under the rubric of religious freedom needs to be allowed. The examples you cited are a good example of where reasonableness needs to be applied. Society can't allow human sacrifice because someone claims that is what their religion requires, nor need we accommodate those whose religion involves the use of illegal substances. But we are not discussing these extremes. We are talking about whether a homeowner is allowed to have a reasonable number of friends over to visit - for whatever purpose - in his privately owned home, or whether the state has the right to interfere with such gatherings when religion is involved. When my daughter was a teenager, we had several parties in which 30 or 40 people were present at our house. Should the government have shut us down? Would it have been different if the people were there for a Bible study instead of a party? In fact, I would expect the Bible study to have a greater degree of protection than a party. Frankly, the fact that we are even discussing the matter gives me great concern for the future of freedom in this country. A few decades ago, such governmental interference would have been unthinkable.