Mankelli,
which religious leader is interested about the good news being preached worldwide at thesame level with the JW leaders?, Although they may claim to be honest and sincere, but what do their works show towards sharing what they knew with others?.
In the book Jehovah's Witnesses in the Divine Purpose on page 37 it quotes from the Watchtower May 1881 where Russell writes,
"But they heeded not his presence and call, as the shadow showed they would they would not, (the "Doctors of Divinity" mostly opposing it, as the "Doctors of Law" had done in the "shadow") After three and one-half years (In 1878) he rejected or left desolate the nominal church here, as he had done in the "shadow"...
It seems to suggested to me that Russell teaching the return of Christ in 1874 felt other Christians who did not accept this had been rejected.
The book then asks the question.
"Why would anyone who claimed to serve God want to fight against a message to the effect that the time had come for the Messiah to present himself a second time...?
It could be because it was false. It seems strange to me that the book would ask such a question in 1959.
In Matthew 24:23-25 it says,
"Then if anyone says to you, 'Look! Here is the Christ, or, "There! so not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will give great signs, and wonders so as to mislead, if possible, even the chosen ones, Look! I have forewarned you. (NWT)
Mankelli do you think God and Christ would be pleased to have a message preached worldwide of Christ's second coming if it proved to be false? Or the birth of God's Kingdom in 1914 if it proved to be incorrect?