But if they were going to point to 2034 in any significant way they are leaving it pretty late now
Curious phenomenon of apocalyptic date setting is that it tends to put the 'end' about 25-40 years in the future.
A few examples come to mind:
Jesus to apostles, not a stone left upon a stone, 33-70 = 37 years
William Miller, came to belief in 1818 that the end was coming in 1844 = 26 yrs
Charles Taze Russell, 1874 to end of 'Gentile Times' in 1914 = 40 years
Fred Franz, 1967 to a vague 'end of the 1914-generation of (abt 1994 or so) = 27 yrs
There's probably a human psychological reason for this, maybe because people can buy into something if it is later in their life and they can see themselves living that long. If the date selected is shorter than that (ie Rutherford's 1025) it just makes them look stupid. If it is longer than 40 years it isn't believable; seems so far off that no one can relate to it.
I'm being cynical, but if the WT wants to set a date, they'll have to spin something around 2050-2065.