Ruba, I presume you're trying to dish humor. If not, you've scored very high on the gullibility scale.
Orph, That's interesting speculation, but I cannot use speculation. I must be able to document what I write from a contemporary source. All I have from available documentation is his father's shifting occupations and a record of investment gone wrong. Nathan, himself, seems not to have had any social status. He attended high school; there is no record of exceptional behavior or status there. He lived with his parents into his 20s. He worked part time in retail as a clerk and go-for. After high school and after attending the Cedar Point Convention he took up colporteur work, what today's Witnesses call pioneering. His mother was a domestic before marriage, someone's maid or housekeeper, a servant. The family does not appear in the local press except in later years as old timers with memories. His dad managed theaters, one after another, finally becoming part owner of one. This is not a socially mobile family. It is a moderately well off family.
What might have been is not history. What might be is not history. So while your speculations are interesting, they lack proof based on a verifiable contemporary source.