Presbyterians and Congregationalists had and still have identical doctrine, differing only in methods of church governance. They had union congregations, where a pastor form either church could officiate. In the little town where I grew up one still existed. I do not know how wide spread the practice is today.
Posts by vienne
-
23
Stroup's "The Jehovah's Witnesses."
by em1913 ina book that doesn't get a lot of talk these days is herbert h. stroup's 1945 study "the jehovah's witnesses.
" which is too bad, because in the field of jw studies it pretty much stands on its own as a serious, scholarly look at the rutherford era of the movement -- one written with no theological or doctrinal axes to grind, but rather with the impartial eye of a professional sociologist.. stroup received no cooperation whatever from brooklyn in writing this book, but he spent a great deal of time among rank-and-file witnesses of the late 1930s and early 1940s, attending their meetings, joining them in field service, and eating at their homes, and what emerges is a picture of an overwhelmingly working-class movement which overlapped in its hopes and ultimate goals the ambitions of other radical social movements of the 1930s.
the witnesses were not marching in labor parades or participating in sit-down strikes or engaging in other forms of street-level radicalism, but stroup finds that, in their individual views on the social and economic structures of the time, they were largely in harmony with those who were, even in spite of their religion's supposed disavowal of politics, and he sees them as much as a political movement in that sense as a religious one.
-
vienne
-
23
Stroup's "The Jehovah's Witnesses."
by em1913 ina book that doesn't get a lot of talk these days is herbert h. stroup's 1945 study "the jehovah's witnesses.
" which is too bad, because in the field of jw studies it pretty much stands on its own as a serious, scholarly look at the rutherford era of the movement -- one written with no theological or doctrinal axes to grind, but rather with the impartial eye of a professional sociologist.. stroup received no cooperation whatever from brooklyn in writing this book, but he spent a great deal of time among rank-and-file witnesses of the late 1930s and early 1940s, attending their meetings, joining them in field service, and eating at their homes, and what emerges is a picture of an overwhelmingly working-class movement which overlapped in its hopes and ultimate goals the ambitions of other radical social movements of the 1930s.
the witnesses were not marching in labor parades or participating in sit-down strikes or engaging in other forms of street-level radicalism, but stroup finds that, in their individual views on the social and economic structures of the time, they were largely in harmony with those who were, even in spite of their religion's supposed disavowal of politics, and he sees them as much as a political movement in that sense as a religious one.
-
vienne
I would have like to have talked to him too.
Interesting observations. I don't think that Rutherford got his anti-Big Business viewpoint from Socialist writing. He worked for the W. J. Bryan campaign and was connect to that wing of the Democrat party. The Democrat party of that era was not as far left-wing as it is today. And this was the era of strong anti-trust action. An out of control drug industry was regulated. This was Rutherford's background, and I believe it is a large factor in the development of his beliefs.
In the Russell era some adherents expressed interest in "Christian Socialism" and one adherent ran on various socialist tickets. Some [John Bartlet Adamson for example. He left the fellowship in the 1890s] found Henry George's economic theories somewhat attractive. So there was a center-left tendency among some believers. Russell discouraged this, saying that a believer's focus should be on evangelism and moral adherence.
Under-explored is Russell's Methodist background. Most don't know that even exists. But many of his social views derive from a conservative Methodist connection, rather than his Calvinist background. Rutherford was a Baptist prior to his association. American Baptists in the post Civil War era tended to be Calvinist in basic doctrine, conservative, farmer-rights oriented, often supporting movements such as the Grange. They saw Big Business [Meat packers, railroads, and wholesalers] as abusing farmers. Remember that America was not industrialized then in any way near to what later years brought about. I think Rutherford's attitudes developed out of this background.
Also, Rutherford opposed prohibition and the League of Nations. He did so on Biblical grounds, or what he thought were Biblical grounds. But as social attitudes, these were shared by the American right.
I'd love to read your additional thoughts. This is fun.
-
23
Stroup's "The Jehovah's Witnesses."
by em1913 ina book that doesn't get a lot of talk these days is herbert h. stroup's 1945 study "the jehovah's witnesses.
" which is too bad, because in the field of jw studies it pretty much stands on its own as a serious, scholarly look at the rutherford era of the movement -- one written with no theological or doctrinal axes to grind, but rather with the impartial eye of a professional sociologist.. stroup received no cooperation whatever from brooklyn in writing this book, but he spent a great deal of time among rank-and-file witnesses of the late 1930s and early 1940s, attending their meetings, joining them in field service, and eating at their homes, and what emerges is a picture of an overwhelmingly working-class movement which overlapped in its hopes and ultimate goals the ambitions of other radical social movements of the 1930s.
the witnesses were not marching in labor parades or participating in sit-down strikes or engaging in other forms of street-level radicalism, but stroup finds that, in their individual views on the social and economic structures of the time, they were largely in harmony with those who were, even in spite of their religion's supposed disavowal of politics, and he sees them as much as a political movement in that sense as a religious one.
-
vienne
On what basis are you defining the Watchtower movement of the 1930s as 'left wing.' I would have described it as tending to the right. Please elaborate.
... And thanks for the kind words about our book and blog.
-
23
Stroup's "The Jehovah's Witnesses."
by em1913 ina book that doesn't get a lot of talk these days is herbert h. stroup's 1945 study "the jehovah's witnesses.
" which is too bad, because in the field of jw studies it pretty much stands on its own as a serious, scholarly look at the rutherford era of the movement -- one written with no theological or doctrinal axes to grind, but rather with the impartial eye of a professional sociologist.. stroup received no cooperation whatever from brooklyn in writing this book, but he spent a great deal of time among rank-and-file witnesses of the late 1930s and early 1940s, attending their meetings, joining them in field service, and eating at their homes, and what emerges is a picture of an overwhelmingly working-class movement which overlapped in its hopes and ultimate goals the ambitions of other radical social movements of the 1930s.
the witnesses were not marching in labor parades or participating in sit-down strikes or engaging in other forms of street-level radicalism, but stroup finds that, in their individual views on the social and economic structures of the time, they were largely in harmony with those who were, even in spite of their religion's supposed disavowal of politics, and he sees them as much as a political movement in that sense as a religious one.
-
vienne
Stroup, a Presbyterian clergyman, wrote a polemic in the guise of a sociological study. He manufactured quotations and made insupportable claims. Stroup was never reliable. Specific claims he made that are false include, but are not limited to, his assertion that Russell claimed to be the last-days 'time clock' appointed as the revealer of last days truth. That's a misrepresentation of a 1910 Overland Monthly article by Russell. He misidentified M. F. Russell. He claimed things about Russell's followers footnoting it to a booklet by Burridge. A check of the original shows the citation is false. He made claims about Watchtower convention attendants and the infamous New Jersey speech by Rutherford that are demonstrably false. I've just scratched the surface with this.
Dr. Schulz, the series editor for our books, examines Stroup and some others in his introductory essay to Separate Identity volume 2. [Yet to be published but nearly finished.]
Volume 1 is available from lulu.com and Amazon.com.
Our history blog is here: https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/
-
19
Blood Transfusions
by new boy intake a wild guess who dreamt up the idea about no blood transfusions for jehovah’s witnesses in the first place?
charles russell, the founder of the church?
judge rushford, the alcoholic and second president?
-
vienne
Our research led us to a now deceased physician who told us that he and his partner had a Witness patient [in 1945] who refused a blood transfusion. The two physicians both Witnesses wrote to the watchtower society asking for their help and stating the patient's religious objections. The Society wrote back stating that the patient was correct in his view of Scripture and the first no-blood article followed in short order. Who made the decision at the Watchtower Society level is unknown, but I suspect it was Franz and not Knorr.
-
31
Is Child Abuse An Issue That You Personally Have Seen In The Organization?
by minimus inas an elder, i saw one child abuse situation involving a man who wanted to be an elder and had i believe 8 children.
he was not in our congregation when this all erupted.
he denied it and moved to another hall and unbelievably, that body of elders wanted to appoint him since they believed his entire family was lying about him.
-
vienne
Yes, when I was a child and attending with my mother, a friend of mine my age (12). She was sexually abused by her father since she was seven. He was expelled from the fellowship and she and her mother stopped attending. Her life afterward was not what I'd wish on anyone.
-
3
Research Question
by vienne inwe need this to further our research... .
the booklet russell, rutherford and "the harp of god" : the heresies of the international bible students association published by the british bible union and written by c. leopold clarke.
we can't find it in any american library.
-
vienne
Excellent, thanks. We think this is an abbreviation of the original 30 page booklet, but it will do nicely. Thanks for your help and interest.
Rachael
-
3
Research Question
by vienne inwe need this to further our research... .
the booklet russell, rutherford and "the harp of god" : the heresies of the international bible students association published by the british bible union and written by c. leopold clarke.
we can't find it in any american library.
-
vienne
We need this to further our research...
We can't find it in any American Library. A good scan or photocopy would serve. Anyone? -
26
Dirt Fishing - Latest Coin Finds
by cofty init's that time of year again when i can get back on the fields with the metal detector looking for ancient stuff.
the first field to be harvested was full of peas - ideal as it leaves no stubble and it's a two minute walk from my house.
it has given up two coins in two visits this week.. the first one is a cut-half silver penny from the reign of henry ii.
-
vienne
I think all episodes of Time Team are on youtube. Still worth watching.
-
20
Why our IQ levels are higher than our grandparents'
by frankiespeakin inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vpqilhw9ui.
-
vienne
Simon,
It's not about what he meant to say. It's about what he said. Language is exacting, or should be. If we must translate what another said, then where is meaning in language?