Cheers Doof
iCeltic
JoinedPosts by iCeltic
-
41
Drive by shootings the new Aussie craze in Sydney!!!!
by Witness 007 inlived there for 10 years till 2005 nothing....now every night a drive by shooting up a house.
what happened sydney!
we feel like te us now..
-
41
Drive by shootings the new Aussie craze in Sydney!!!!
by Witness 007 inlived there for 10 years till 2005 nothing....now every night a drive by shooting up a house.
what happened sydney!
we feel like te us now..
-
iCeltic
Where are all the shootings? I haven't heard about any.
-
41
Drive by shootings the new Aussie craze in Sydney!!!!
by Witness 007 inlived there for 10 years till 2005 nothing....now every night a drive by shooting up a house.
what happened sydney!
we feel like te us now..
-
iCeltic
If they did in the US what they did after Port Arthur here, even allowing criminals to bring in guns used in crimes, it would cut guns murders, imo.
-
41
Drive by shootings the new Aussie craze in Sydney!!!!
by Witness 007 inlived there for 10 years till 2005 nothing....now every night a drive by shooting up a house.
what happened sydney!
we feel like te us now..
-
iCeltic
I've not seen anything on the news about shootings here in Sydney, maybe I don't watch the news enough.
-
272
A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC
by Londo111 inthis is the main series playlist:.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.
this is the accompanying video appendix:.
-
iCeltic
I'd be interested in having a PDF of it, anytime in the future when you have the time. I must confess I'd be lost talking with a jw about this at the moment but having it handy on the iPad or phone would be excellent.
-
33
It's the JW's fault that I no longer see evidence for god......apparently.
by punkofnice inif i had a quid for the amount of times i've been told that the reason i no longer see evidence for a god is because the watchtower(tm) damaged my trust in god.....................................i'd have at least a pony!*.
could there be any truth in this?.
have you been told similar for your choices in 'spirituality'?.
-
iCeltic
If that was me I'd need to disagree, my view of god came from the jw in the first place and I never did question whether they were correct or not. Now I am able to freely choose for myself I just dnt see the evidence. I would like to see evidence but I've yet to see it (or feel it)
-
272
A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC
by Londo111 inthis is the main series playlist:.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.
this is the accompanying video appendix:.
-
iCeltic
Jeffro, agreed, it is rather frustrating reading his posts.
-
272
A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC
by Londo111 inthis is the main series playlist:.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.
this is the accompanying video appendix:.
-
iCeltic
Scholar, I agree that mistakes help us grow, the only difference is that mistakes from the wt aren't admitted and people's lives are affected by these arrogant mistakes.
-
272
A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC
by Londo111 inthis is the main series playlist:.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.
this is the accompanying video appendix:.
-
iCeltic
Neil, you being cheeky back to Jeffro kinda takes away from your argument as well, it goes both ways. I'd be I tested in seeing the specific quotes from the many that support wt view.
-
272
A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC
by Londo111 inthis is the main series playlist:.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.
this is the accompanying video appendix:.
-
iCeltic
Strangely I found this a very interesting discussion. I was never that clued up on it even when I was a jw but my first thought would be if you have a date in mind (1914) that you want to match this to, does that in itself not become a problem? If you are looking at history to fit what you want it to for rather than having a clear mind. And the absolute fact that Russell first came up with 1914 by measuring pyramids and that so happened to fit what the bible says and now 607 happens to fits wt's vision of 1874....sorry, 1914.
it is rather irritating that scholar refers to himself the way he does, I'd also say though that (I'll firstly say that I've really enjoyed your posts Jeffro) always calling scholar an idiot isn't the best, name calling begins to take away from what you are saying, just my view and you're welcome to ignore it.
im glad he's a jw and comes here.