Thi Chi--
Very interesting points.. my head is just spinning with spin:
I must disagree.
Fine. You can disagree all you would like. First, in my statement I was giving personal experience. How you can argue that is beyond me.
Secondly, I did not say that there are more accidents caused by marijuana usage then alcohol. It is obvious that isn't the case. But your statement is misleading when the "old-timer" cop said, "I have never respond to a bad car accident where the people involved were just high on pot. I have with alcohol.” BAD car accidents...Well, that doesn't mean that he hasn't worked car wrecks with people that were under the influence of marijuana. (By the way, I HAVE worked bad car wrecks from people under the influence of marijuana, for clarification marijuana ONLY, and yes, they were impaired because they were high).
The per sei limit federally for every state is .08 . This study would need to be reviewed since there has been scientific evidence presented since 1970 to lower the b.a.c. to the current .08 enacted. Obviously the scientific evidence would have to show the affects of alcohol/intoxicants on the human body. In fact, you can be declared "less safe" to drive at .06. Therefore, the studies would need to be adjusted accordingly if they are basing it on a .15 or .10 standard.
Cannabis does not impair driving performance as much as alcohol
I never said it didn't. But it still impairs. That was the point.
Obviously, you have clarified the distinction between the two types of forfiture. To break it down to layman's terms.. the criminal forfiture occurs to secure evidence of a crime. Obviously this is governed by the constituion under the fourth. In fact, this is NECCESSARY to protect the citizens in obtaining convictions for public offenders.
You know as well as I do that the fourth amendment covers the qualifications for a warrantless seizure of person or property. Your arguement seems to lie with the US Constitution. Of all the cases you have "quoted" (and I don't doubt you got these quotes from your latest copy of High Times, (only kidding), are governmental agencies that have acted outside of the Constitution guidelines set out by the fourth. I'm sure that punitive actions have been taken against these agencies where the person was wronged. And well deserved.
Never at anytime do I claim this system is fair. But at no point am I going to sit back and listen to the spin spewed forth here that sounds like there are no victims in an individual's choice to use marijuana.
Please post who you copied this from ---
Law enforcement agencies should be required to publish an explanation each time they seize and retain private property.
BTW, we already do.. those are the nice little cars and trucks seized by agencies that say "THIS CAR SEIZED FROM A DRUG DEALER - D.A.R.E."
ofcmad
(edited because i screwed up the quote brackets)