Posts by Doubter

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

What are you doing?

You are trying to compare one year of abuse cases in Australia to 65 years of cases with jws. Where’s the fairness in that?

To make it fair, we will take what was submitted to the ARC concerning abuse cases in WT from August 2015-August 2016.

In 2015-16 there were 67,748 jws in Australia. The branch submitted 17 reports to the ARC during that time span (two decided not to report as they were adults). But I’ll roll with 17. There were 5559 against a population of 24 million on the same time span for Australia has a whole.

That’s a ratio of 1 victim per about 4,000 members, which is still slightly higher than the ratio for the population of Australia.

The higher the population, the more cases, but the lower ratio. The lower the population, the lower the number of cases, but the higher the ratio.

It’s much more productive to compare similar groups of an equal or similar size or the numbers will always be skewed, especially when you’re trying to compare 24 million to a paltry 67,700.

Shucks, even one case in Australia means you have a one in 24 million chance of getting abused. One case in WT mean you have a one in 67 thousand chance. The rate will ALWAYS be higher.

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

lol I see what you did there.

You have to compare Australian jws against the Australia population, and US jws with the US population for a truly accurate (and fair) comparison.

Its not even a valid comparison to compare Australian jws with the US population.

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Back at ya!

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Ignore me? Dub just minimized child sex abuse. He told the millions of abused children that their abusers merely “slipped through the cracks”.

One abused child is one to many.

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

And before you attempt to discredit child help:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhelp

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Dub,

Tell me, how is losing 4 to 7 children to abuse ever day is some “slipping through the cracks”, with the US having one of the worse child abuse records of industrialized nations?

https://www.childhelp.org/child-abuse-statistics/

You are the dumb idiot. The US doesn’t do much at all to prevent child abuse. The stats prove that.

Go gets some facts, then come back, and talk. Or keep burying your head in the sand.

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Our legal system lets convicted pedophiles back onto society on a daily basis.

They've proven to have fooled college educated parole boards, and nothing stops them from looking for their next victim. They also have re-offended, many times.

Whats the difference?

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Lol

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

Disagree with us, you’re a troll. Agree with us, you’re “woke”.

113

EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection

by cofty in

today's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.

the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.

the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.

Doubter

I mean I get it. Anyone not nodding their head or those who critically analyze what you say is a “troll”.

Not much different than jw forums/blogs that think all differing opinions are from “apostates”.

I actually believed this place was different and was open to challenging viewpoints.