Yes, they do. WT magazines say God will do the exact same things the UN claims it can.
JWs support God as being the source of that. DPI NGOs were not obligated to give support to the UN as being the source.
You are wrong, again.
Doubter
JoinedPosts by Doubter
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
The goals of the UN is not in violation of JW beliefs.
They absolutely agree with those goals.
Who wouldn’t? DPI NGOs were not members of the UN at the time anyway. So there was no giving political support of the UN itself.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
NVM
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Finklestien,
Prove it.
Post the 1992 Charter and the current one.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
You’re attempting to point out hypocrisy without pointing it out.
All you really have to do is show that they agreed with things in the charter that violated their beliefs in 92.
That is really easy to do, if those violations actually exists.
Until then, I’ll simply sit back an observe you all refusing to post the 1992 UN Charter.
The Charter is your gold mine.
Posting about the YMCA and blood banks (which the UN is neither) are merely laughable red herrings.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
Where does it say the same thing about the UN as it does the YMCA and a blood bank?
Or... “it doesn’t matter”...?
What did the charter say in 92?
Or does it matter?
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Ok, let’s tackle that.
(1) where is it a sin, in any publication, for an individual Witness to agree with the UN charter in 1992 when this happened?
(2) the GB have never agreed with a charter that was drafted by a religion they deem “Babylon the great” and entered a contract with them.
So you are wrong on both counts.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
See my above post.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Read my above statement.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
-
Doubter
Of course you have to agree to the UN Charter before becoming a DPI NGO, just as you have to agree to the terms the IRS lays out for tax exempt organizations before becoming tax exempt.
That doesn’t make jws anymore part of the UN than it makes them part of the IRS.
The issue is whether or not, in 1992, what they agreed with when this happened, violated their beliefs.
Once you show that, you have a legit argument.