I am not disputing how it’s looked at legally — I am clarifying it’s use.
And of course, your prisoner point has NEVER HAPPENED so you’re spouting nonsense and pure, irrational paranoia
Besides, what’s stopping a criminal or ex con from doing what criminals have always done — break into homes without a “not at home” list?
What evidence do you have that ex cons have ever used a not at home to burglarize a home?