Get in line. The blood issue has been rehashed since WW2 really. The shunning issue was made clear in recent PUBLIC conventions. Child abuse? Go back to 2002.
Its the same ol tired stuff.
Doubter
JoinedPosts by Doubter
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
“Apostates” are obsessed with Jws, and they are in near-constant communication with the media.
So the scandal-mongering media DOES, regularly, contact the branch offices. One of the main purposes of the recent child abuse doc was so they could sent it to the media.
The Netherlands is a good example of the “apostate” obsession.
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
Sure, no one cares what JW’s think, but the media constantly hounds them.
Okay. I’ll accept that!
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
Steve -
What?
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
Lol - you want to interview JW representatives, popping up out of the bushes is definitely a way to denied. Coming with an army of opposers along side you, or coming at the behest of opposers won’t net anything.
Reporters are chasing THEM down, not the other way round. So they would have to play by their rules, and allow them to control the interview.
Since they refuse to give them control, they get snubbed. It’s really that simple.
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
If you believe accusations against you are false, you do more harm than good by debating them because you give them more, free publicity and keep them in the news longer than what they ought to be.
What I’m saying is, you can only talk to yourself for so long before moving on to something else.
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
If you say so. You can have your truth.
-
59
Cognitive Dissonace on full display at JWtalk over evolution research
by Sanchy ina user over on the jwtalk forum recently shared a warning over his research on evolution in preparation for an assigned talk.
after detailing a couple of the tidbits that he learned of during his research, he went on to say:.
this i found to be useful especially when talking ot others in the ministry.. but and it is a big but.....
-
-
Doubter
Sir82,
Now you’re just complaining.
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
Lol, so you admit she was there to bait them and not to actually attend the event.
So you basically validated their reason for revoking her invitation.
They had every reason to deny her entry.
-
71
Protesters at today’s assembly on the news
by Tahoe inhttps://www.wgal.com/article/jehovah-s-witness-event-met-with-protestors/22834659 .
-
-
Doubter
Oh please. She was being sarcastic in an attempt to draw an imaginary contradiction between being invited and then being denied entry.
And I’m sure you fell for it..
As I said, invitations to private events are honored at the discretion of the sponsor of the event, and no reason for denying entry is necessary. But she was denied clearly because he was not there for the event. She was there to inquire of members their response to the accusations made by protestors.
Valid reason to deny them.
Thats how this stuff works.