i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
Doubling down doesn’t make your argument more truthful.
Vouching support for the UN to achieve its goals, and agreeing with it goals (the same ones you have) are really not nearly the same thing.
I agree with the goals of the police to maintain order. Does that mean I look to them as the ultimate solution over God?
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Fink,
Read, slowly...1992...1992....1992.
The initial agreement is what matters most. Once they change and you find out, then you go from there.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Yes, they do. WT magazines say God will do the exact same things the UN claims it can.
JWs support God as being the source of that. DPI NGOs were not obligated to give support to the UN as being the source.
You are wrong, again.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
The goals of the UN is not in violation of JW beliefs.
They absolutely agree with those goals.
Who wouldn’t? DPI NGOs were not members of the UN at the time anyway. So there was no giving political support of the UN itself.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
NVM
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Finklestien,
Prove it.
Post the 1992 Charter and the current one.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
You’re attempting to point out hypocrisy without pointing it out.
All you really have to do is show that they agreed with things in the charter that violated their beliefs in 92.
That is really easy to do, if those violations actually exists.
Until then, I’ll simply sit back an observe you all refusing to post the 1992 UN Charter.
The Charter is your gold mine.
Posting about the YMCA and blood banks (which the UN is neither) are merely laughable red herrings.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
Where does it say the same thing about the UN as it does the YMCA and a blood bank?
Or... “it doesn’t matter”...?
What did the charter say in 92?
Or does it matter?
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Ok, let’s tackle that.
(1) where is it a sin, in any publication, for an individual Witness to agree with the UN charter in 1992 when this happened?
(2) the GB have never agreed with a charter that was drafted by a religion they deem “Babylon the great” and entered a contract with them.
So you are wrong on both counts.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
See my above post.
