i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Where did I say that charter agreement was not necessary?
I said that the charter doesn’t say what you claim it says. In other words you’re forcefully interpreting it and watchtower articles.
In fact, as I recall, the portion of the charter you showed idid not say that dpi NGOs had to support actively, the United Nations.
so it appears that you’re the one who’s the big liar.
it seems you want to ignore the type of NGO wt was, Or does it really matter?
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
You're making your job harder. Just stop it.
You will end up having to show that every year from 1992-2001(?) or 2004, I don’t remember which, they agreed to support to UN as the solution it peace so to maintain DPI NGO status.
You haven’t proven they did it in 92. I seriously doubt you want this additional burden of proof.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Since there are/were many NGOs, also look up the 1992 requirements to qualify for DPI NGO status (which WT was).
Just saying, accusing someone of being in cahoots with the UN requires much more than selectively interpreting WT articles.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
This why interpreting this stuff fails.
It does not give direct support for, nor does it directly oppose, God’s Kingdom IN THE CHARTER, which this is about.
So you cannot unequivocally say that it went against JW beliefs.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy, you said:
“By WT "signing the paper", it wasn't agreeing with just a generic goal of achieving peace, it was agreeing with the "blasphemous" goal of seeking such world peace without God.”
This will be spelled out in the 1992 charter/contract. Or are you, again, forcefully interpreting stuff?
Where is that language? Where did an NGO DPI have to support the UN and it’s goals as the means of achieving peace?
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Sanchy,
if I have to “decipher” your arguments, they are convoluted.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
I think my police analogy was appropriate.
I agree with the goals of police, to maintain peace in order, and to arrest criminals, etc.
I would even sign a piece of paper saying that I support those goals.
As long as there is no language that says I have to give support to my local PD as the ultimate solution to crime, I can sign it and not violate my beliefs.
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
I’ve got plenty left, sanchy my man!
You haven’t proven your case. You went from the YMCA, to blood banks, to your interpretation of principles, to agreeing they support peace, to agreeing with me that they don’t look to the UN, etc.
This is a prime example of people making stuff up as they go...
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
Faded Twice -
Of course I’m pointing out where I think I’m right. And you don’t?
You also said that the Revelation Book and Rutherford called to UN “Babylon the Great”.
In all the “research” you’ve allegedly done, you can’t find those quotes?
Do they exists?
i would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
You’re spinning it. First you bring up blood banks and the YMCA - that failed as those are not the UN.
Then you admit WT supports peace, as the UN does. Now you’re saying they don’t via the UN (which I stated initially).
Make up your mind.
