Let me revisit my statement. They didn’t directly thank the guardian after re reading it, they instead said they were grateful it was brought to their attention.
Doubter
JoinedPosts by Doubter
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Lol.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
If they did threaten to sue, it’s because they were falsely accused.
That’s how you discourage that sort of behavior.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
You said that once already, and you’re wrong. The WT thanked the guardian for bringing the NGO changes to its attention in the 2001 letter, changes that violate their beliefs, and they withdrew.
They THANKED the guardian.
Lol.
But I never really expected you to bring any of this out.
I bet you’re going to say they need a “worldly newspaper” and not Jehovah to tell them those changes.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
You’re not happy I’m here. It’s just makes you feel better saying that, despite your excuse.
An individual JW is free to have affiliation with any organization he wants, granted his association does not require a violation of his beliefs.
But you’re obligated to manufacture hypocrisy, so you’d say anything to make that happen.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Where did I say that charter agreement was not necessary?
I said that the charter doesn’t say what you claim it says. In other words you’re forcefully interpreting it and watchtower articles.
In fact, as I recall, the portion of the charter you showed idid not say that dpi NGOs had to support actively, the United Nations.
so it appears that you’re the one who’s the big liar.
it seems you want to ignore the type of NGO wt was, Or does it really matter?
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
You're making your job harder. Just stop it.
You will end up having to show that every year from 1992-2001(?) or 2004, I don’t remember which, they agreed to support to UN as the solution it peace so to maintain DPI NGO status.
You haven’t proven they did it in 92. I seriously doubt you want this additional burden of proof.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Since there are/were many NGOs, also look up the 1992 requirements to qualify for DPI NGO status (which WT was).
Just saying, accusing someone of being in cahoots with the UN requires much more than selectively interpreting WT articles.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Sanchy,
This why interpreting this stuff fails.
It does not give direct support for, nor does it directly oppose, God’s Kingdom IN THE CHARTER, which this is about.
So you cannot unequivocally say that it went against JW beliefs.
-
146
The Governing Body / Jehovah`s Witnesses and the Sin Of Omission ,How guilty are they ? Can you give an example ?
by smiddy3 ini would like as many people that can, to respond to this appeal as i am sure their are many examples out their that may help lurkers and fence sitters to make a decision on where they stand regarding the "truth".
i look forward to your comments either negative or plus..
-
Doubter
Sanchy, you said:
“By WT "signing the paper", it wasn't agreeing with just a generic goal of achieving peace, it was agreeing with the "blasphemous" goal of seeking such world peace without God.”
This will be spelled out in the 1992 charter/contract. Or are you, again, forcefully interpreting stuff?
Where is that language? Where did an NGO DPI have to support the UN and it’s goals as the means of achieving peace?