Address my point, or don’t. My alleged “purpose“ for being here has nothing to do with the veracity of my arguments.
Doubter
JoinedPosts by Doubter
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Simon called me a liar but did not prove it.
Just a blind assertion by him.
Of course, “NOT AT HOMES” are shared. But that’s not what I was saying. We all know that when you have a PERSONAL call, the only time it’s turned over is when you relocate from the territory or die. And even then, its not always the case.
But even so, this is really all moot. The law won’t have that large an impact jw ministry. They’ll simply adapt as always.
When under ban, they went underground. In the concentration camps, they still preached. Christianity as a whole, no matter what group one belonged to, never had their obligation to preach, totally snuffed out.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
SN,
Nice strawman buddy. I didn’t say calculate the chance of someone reading a lost notebook. I said calculate the chance of someone LOSING a notebook compared to getting hacked.
nice try
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
The point is, the Bible is a written record, a record about people. No getting around that.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Paul did take notes. He wrote 13 letters detailing his preaching work.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Oh yeah I confused the two. My bad.
No reason to obey one law and not the other.
And you should fight things that can possibly restrict your freedom to preach in some way. But really, there is no need to write things down to get their stuff done.
Just have to commit it to memory until you get home.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Cofty,
Was that a serious statement?
several months ago, they were already forms sent out to congregation members requesting their permission to store and use their information.
There is also a letter, not only stating their compliance with the law, but stating how the law can also be used to their own benefit as well.
It seems you want them to be non-compliant.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Seeing how jws are “declining”, less and less people are talking to them anyway so that even further reduces the chances of them getting personal information to potentially lose.
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
I don’t see how you clearly missed my point, though I thought I explained very well.
Just to reinterate, calculate the chances your information gets hacked on a network with “protections“ against the chances it gets compromised by me dropping a notebook with you info in it
at some point, your arguments will have to be practical, logical, and realistic and not purely anti-JW
-
113
EU Court Ruling Against WT on Data-Protection
by cofty intoday's london times reports on the july ruling of the eu court that forces the organisation country to comply with data protection.. the action originated in finland but the ruling will affect every eu country.
the cult tried unsuccessfully to argue that the notes taken by jws in the door-to-door work were personal and not accessed by the congregation.
the court ruled that they are acting under the auspices of the congregation and therefore they must comply with data-protection laws.. keeping lists of do-not-calls also falls under this ruling.. why does the cult always feel that it is above the law?.
-
-
Doubter
Alive!
Well, if that’s your rationale, make it illegal to store information on computers connected to the internet.
Cyber identity theft has never been higher. You have an exponentially greater chance of having your information hacked than lost in a jw notebook that was dropped in a train station.
That’s not a strong argument.