Vidqun

Joined

• started 26 topics
• posted 2,000 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Vidqun

• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  It's a bum rap. Perhaps I should add a correction as I understand it: One volcano puts more CO2 in atmosphere than all mankind's efforts for the period of the eruption. And that's all concession you'll get from me. I stick to the rest of my posts.

  So much for "global warming." Many people think more of us are doomed to die from warmer temperatures but a new Lancet study found cold killed 77x more people in Britain & Wales on average annually than heat (60,573 vs 791 deaths) btw 2000- 2019.
  

  https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(22)00138-3/fulltext
  
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  Earth's atmosphere is composed of about 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon and 0.1% other gases. CO2 makes up 0.04% of the "other gases. Of this number 97% comes from nature, plants and animals, and only 3% of that is caused by humans. By the way, plants use up some of it in a process called photosynthesis. Is CO2 a problem? Work it out for yourself. The Dutch government has a problem with the nitrogen "pollution" of its farmers. It's quite ludicrous.

  
  
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  Why push the Climate Change agenda? First reason would be that climate alarmism is an attempt by the establishment to assist in restoring social control. In every attempt to push the climate change agenda is a call for people to unite.

  Second reason has to do with money. According to Bank of America and one of their “Thematic Research” tomes, to achieve Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050, will have a hefty price tag. It will be costing the nations in the vicinity of $150 trillion over thirty years. This amounts to about $5 trillion in annual investments which is two times the current world GDP. Simply put, “it provides an endless stream of taxpayer and debt-funded "investments" which in turn need a just as constant degree of debt monetization by central banks.”

  Third reason would be population control. If the nations do succeed in reaching Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050 many will have to be sacrificed on the altar of unsustainability. A Net Zero carbon environment will be unable to sustain 8000,000,000 people. Thus, war, pestilence, famine and vaccines, causing sterility and premature death, have to be introduced to cull the numbers to more manageable levels.

  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  Joey jojo, see if you can work it out. Nasa' in Hebrew means "to deceive." Solar activity, and not carbon emissions, is responsible for temperature and weather fluctuations. Of all the gases in our atmosphere, carbon dioxide makes up 0.04% of the total. Of that number 97% comes from nature, plants and animals, and only a negligible 3% is caused by humans. One large volcano eruption produces more CO2 than the total of man's contribution. Makes me think of the Dutch government, trying to curb nitrogen use of their farmers. Complete madness.
  
• 
  39

  Climate propaganda

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  gotta love jwdotorg as usual regurgitating the financially/politically motivated (and thoroughly disproved) climate change propaganda:.

  https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/more-topics/ruining-the-earth-bible-meaning-hope/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  There's climate change all right, but it has nothing to do with CO2 levels.

  https://www.sott.net/article/420049-NASA-admits-climate-change-occurs-because-of-changes-in-Earths-solar-orbit-not-because-of-SUVs-and-fossil-fuels
  
• 
  32

  “This generation will by no means pass away.”

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  for argument sake let’s assume that this verse should apply to 1914. what are your thoughts on generation?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  I prefer Christendom’s explanation: All predictions will happen within a generation (Matt. 24:34). Also the generation that sees and experiences the "great tribulation" of vv. 21, 22 will not pass away until all the predicted things have occurred. Most commentators give the length of the tribulation as seven years. Jesus then used the fig tree as a natural illustration and not as a typical one. In other words, just as a budding fig tree is a sign that summer is near, so the great tribulation itself is a sign of the end of the age (Matt. 24:32, 33).
• 
  11

  Question #2 for JW's

  by BoogerMan in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how could the "two witnesses" mentioned in revelation chapter 11 possibly be j.f.

  rutherford and his companions who got jailed and then released in 1919?.

  w14 11/15 p. 30 - so in the fulfillment of revelation chapter 11, the anointed brothers who took the lead at the time of the establishment of god’s kingdom in heaven in 1914 preached “in sackcloth” for three and a half years.. watchtower november 15, 2014, p. 30 - revelation 11:7 says that it is "the wild beast that ascends out of the abyss" which kills the 'two witnesses'.. since the wild beast of rev.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Vidqun

  Yes Judgerusselford, I agree. They fit the passages of Revelation in to suit their interpretation. But the seven seals are first, followed by the seven trumpet blasts and then comes the seven bowels of plague. Towards the end of the plagues, the kings of the earth prepare for Armageddon. Then their cities are destroyed and lastly is the turn of Babylon the Great. They place the destruction of Babylon at the beginning of the tribulation.