I spent a lot of time last summer methodically going through the gospel of John to see if it really DID teach the trinity. This was because I was pretty sure I wasn't going to be a Witness much longer, and then what would I be? I wondered if I would be able to realign myself with orthodox Christianity.
The result? I came away believing that more often than not, John's gospel did NOT teach a trinitarian God. The references upholding the Father's superior power and knowledge far outweigh the 3 or 4 verses that could possibly be interpreted as trinitarian proof texts. (I did not use a NWT for my study, BTW.)
I was happy to learn that many minds greater than mine could not wrap themselves around such a concept: -- Newton, Jefferson, Tolstoy, Milton, Servetus, and Knox. Admittedly, these are HUMAN minds. But human minds are what God gave us to unravel the words recorded by human hands in the Scriptures. So I figure if it were important to accept the Trinity in order to please God or to have salvation, it would be obvious that this was so.
Instead, I choose to believe (deliberate choice of words here) that there is a God and that he has offered us a way to feel close to him by having his unique Son, Jesus the Man/Messiah, show us the way in which we should walk. That the Father is a hearer of prayer, especially if it is offered while acknowledging his Son's mediatorship.
I am not certain if there may be other ways to approach God acceptably that do not include Jesus, perhaps just treating our fellow humans with love and respect and compassion is enough to please him. My mind's jury is still out on that one. For now, since I love the Jesus I've known as part of my Christian upbringing, and because I'm free now to acknowledge him more fully than I ever could as a Witness, I'm enjoying that freedom.
outnfree
A man must not swallow more beliefs than he can digest.
-- Havelock Ellis