God controls the skies and the rain (Psalm 77:16-19)
If God controls the skies then Satan has no power to control a Star let alone the planets, according to the Bible of course.
I_love_Jeff
JoinedPosts by I_love_Jeff
-
10
If Daniel was the chief of the Magoi then why did God choose a pagan to be a prophet?
by I_love_Jeff intwo part question:.
if god allowed daniel to be chief of the magoi, why would the magi be considered bad in the eyes of jah, according to the jehovah's witnesses?
the jehovah's witnesses of course believe that the magi, pagan astrologers, were not god's messengers because of their dabblings in the occult.
-
-
-
10
If Daniel was the chief of the Magoi then why did God choose a pagan to be a prophet?
by I_love_Jeff intwo part question:.
if god allowed daniel to be chief of the magoi, why would the magi be considered bad in the eyes of jah, according to the jehovah's witnesses?
the jehovah's witnesses of course believe that the magi, pagan astrologers, were not god's messengers because of their dabblings in the occult.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Two part question:
If God allowed Daniel to be chief of the Magoi, why would the Magi be considered bad in the eyes of Jah, according to the Jehovah's Witnesses?
The Jehovah's Witnesses of course believe that the Magi, pagan astrologers, were not God's messengers because of their dabblings in the occult. If that were true then why did God move the Star after the Magi talked to Herod? Why didn't God just get rid of the Magi somehow if they were considered pratitioners of an occult art which is automatically deemded wicked in God's eyes?
-
7
If Jesus is supposed to be Michael, would they not hold the same opinions about peace?
by I_love_Jeff inwhy is jesus seen as a man of peace and michael as a warrior?
are they both not the same and have the same opinions about non violence?
are the jehovah's witnesses a bit confused?.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Why is Jesus seen as a man of peace and Michael as a Warrior? Are they both not the same and have the same opinions about non violence? Are the Jehovah's Witnesses a bit confused?
-
22
Why are the Jehovah's Witnesses not allowed to carry a weapon (for protection) during field service?
by I_love_Jeff inif jesus allowed peter to carry a sword for protection, why are the jehovah's witnesses against carry a weapon during their "fun" door-to-door adventuring?
it seems jesus did not mind that peter carried a sword if we read luke 22:36-38. is it another case of picking and choosing what works for their man-made doctrine?.
is defending oneself a violent act, according to the jehovah's witnesses?
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Sir82- Your sarcasm is unappreciated. Sveral of you have made valid points. Thank you for your answers. They are much appreciated.
-
30
I need your help friends. Which logical fallacy is being used here?
by I_love_Jeff injw states: since the apostles made mistakes, it is okay for us to make mistakes as well".
is it the logical fallacy of "two wrongs make a right"?
the apostles were directed by god, the governing body is not.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Actually, if it were "two wrongs make a right" that would be justifying the mistakes made by the Jehovah's Witnesses even though their teachings are not of God.
-
30
I need your help friends. Which logical fallacy is being used here?
by I_love_Jeff injw states: since the apostles made mistakes, it is okay for us to make mistakes as well".
is it the logical fallacy of "two wrongs make a right"?
the apostles were directed by god, the governing body is not.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
JW states: Since the apostles made mistakes, it is okay for us to make mistakes as well"
Is it the logical fallacy of "two wrongs make a right"?
The apostles were directed by God, the Governing Body is not. I am sure this has been posted many times but am in dire need of a quick response at the moment, thank you kindly : )
-
22
Why are the Jehovah's Witnesses not allowed to carry a weapon (for protection) during field service?
by I_love_Jeff inif jesus allowed peter to carry a sword for protection, why are the jehovah's witnesses against carry a weapon during their "fun" door-to-door adventuring?
it seems jesus did not mind that peter carried a sword if we read luke 22:36-38. is it another case of picking and choosing what works for their man-made doctrine?.
is defending oneself a violent act, according to the jehovah's witnesses?
-
-
I_love_Jeff
THANK YOU MARVIN SHILMER!!!!
-
22
Why are the Jehovah's Witnesses not allowed to carry a weapon (for protection) during field service?
by I_love_Jeff inif jesus allowed peter to carry a sword for protection, why are the jehovah's witnesses against carry a weapon during their "fun" door-to-door adventuring?
it seems jesus did not mind that peter carried a sword if we read luke 22:36-38. is it another case of picking and choosing what works for their man-made doctrine?.
is defending oneself a violent act, according to the jehovah's witnesses?
-
-
I_love_Jeff
If Jesus allowed Peter to carry a sword for protection, why are the Jehovah's Witnesses against carry a weapon during their "fun" door-to-door adventuring? It seems Jesus did not mind that Peter carried a sword if we read Luke 22:36-38
Is it another case of picking and choosing what works for their man-made doctrine?
Is defending oneself a violent act, according to the Jehovah's Witnesses? Not to Jesus and Jehovah.
Are the Jehovah's Witnesses in disagreement with Jesus in regards to this topic?
Do they not follow the Bible to a tee?
"Deuteronomy 20 contains Yahweh's instructions about war. If a city does not accept Israel's offer of peace and open its gates, then "when the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it" (verse13). With regard to other cities, the command is (verse 16), "Do not leave anything that breathes.""
"....The Israelites destroyed with the sword every living thing in it - men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep, and donkeys" (Joshua 6:21). This certainly seems brutal and vindictive, doesn't it?
Or consider Joshua 11:20, "For it was the Lord himself who hardened their hearts to wage war against Israel, so that he might destroy them totally, exterminating them without mercy, as the Lord had commanded Moses."
-
5
Claiming to be the ONLY TRUE ORG. is not a SIN in the eyes of Jehovah?
by I_love_Jeff inis arrogance a sin?????
what does jah say about arrogance???.
claiming to be the only true org.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Definition of ARROGANCE
: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions
-
5
Claiming to be the ONLY TRUE ORG. is not a SIN in the eyes of Jehovah?
by I_love_Jeff inis arrogance a sin?????
what does jah say about arrogance???.
claiming to be the only true org.
-
-
I_love_Jeff
Is arrogance a sin????? What does Jah say about arrogance???
Claiming to be the ONLY TRUE ORG. is not a sin in the eyes of Jehovah????
*** Life Everlasting book pe chap. 22 p. 190 Identifying the True Religion ***ONE TRUE RELIGION
19 It is only logical that there would be one true religion. This is in harmony with the fact that the true God is a God, "not of disorder, but of peace." (1 Corinthians 14:33) The Bible says that actually there is only "one faith." (Ephesians 4:5) Who, then, are the ones who form the body of true worshipers today?
20 We do not hesitate to say that they are Jehovah's Witnesses.