I wish Vicki Boer's lawyer spent more time exploring what "free choice" means in JW land. Simply being "free to call the authorities" presents a misleading picture of the reality.
I wonder how the WT explains why JW males don't wear beards, why most JW's "choose" not to vote, why they don't celebrate birthdays or why so few went on to get higher education etc when none of these things are supposedly "forbidden"?
The whole culture of being a JW has to be transferred into the minds of judges and juries so they can get a clear picture of reality and how jw's have been conditioned and influenced to act a certain way.
I thought Quote's illustration of the baby elephant that is chained to a post in the ground was good. When that elephant grows up and could easily rip out the post from the ground he simply doesn't because of the psychological conditioning he's had from a baby.
"Free choice" often has consequences and reprocussions in the congregation if one chooses what goes against the conditioned conciences of the majority.
JT's comments regarding "what way is the society LEANING" on a certain matter give insight into what drives elders and CO's to react a certain way to situations that arrise - even when things are not plainly spelled out in print.
Perhaps having good arguments and lines of reasoning made available to lawyers will help them better anticipate and counter the reasoning of WT lawyers. Just as all JW's will compare a blood transfusion to being raped for emotional impact, perhaps we need to have a few well thought out lines of our own to help non-JW's truly understand JW culture.
Path