this will never work but liberals are too stupid to know it.
first off all you have to do is cross the border and buy a car.
if they will not let you license it in the state then many will license it out of state.
moving away from fossil fuels is a good idea, because they are not the future, and they are not unlimited. At some point, we face the simple fact that oil will run out sooner than the sun or the wind.
So, we need to continue to invest in research of products that are comparable and that don't rely on them. Even if currently creating electrical cars involves burning fossil fuels or mining of some metals, we don't just throw our hands up and say....well we give up.
he has been wearing a mask.
his top assistant got it and it appears spread it.
so???
Not to his core base, but I think it does make him look a bit more vulnerable, and hurts his image. If he bounces back quickly it might on the other hand help him. We'll see.
Was looking at the stock market today and there is a bit of a slump probably because of these news.
this will never work but liberals are too stupid to know it.
first off all you have to do is cross the border and buy a car.
if they will not let you license it in the state then many will license it out of state.
I like the idea of starting to wean off from fossil fuels and there are countries that are well more advanced that we are. I do think this plan is too daring and I'm not sure if it's workable. The thing that will pull us away from the combustion cars is research and development which will drive the market to adopt other technologies. Simply build a better product and the consumers will follow.
The moment that electrical cars become cheaper and comparable to combustion engines for things such as distance, easy recharging, etc, you can say bye bye to combustion cars, and for good reason. At some point in history we will look back at combustion cars and laugh at how we put up with noisy, smelly clunkers to take ur around town.
they have predicted this for years.
religions of the world would become attacked by the governments.
the only difference is when they go after jehovah’s witnesses, then jehovah god will step in and destroy the governments..
There is no way this will happen. Religion works in the favor of governments. It keeps some people in line and keeps the minds of people busy. Plus in some countries they can actually control religion which is yet another way to control people.
Religions will slowly erode into the past, and will more than likely be replaced by other religions. In fact this is already happening. Even as the world trends towards atheism, more people start following other cults and belief systems, such as the political cults we see today. Even without traditional religion people will continue to feel the need to align around beliefs and causes, so you can expect this not to go away.
Joe Rogan would do a nice job at moderating, but any long form discussion with someone that is a moderate or an independent would be better than the format of these debates which are terrible to get any sense of how anybody thinks.
agree with those saying that Wallace was somewhat biased against Trump, but to be fair, Trump made his job extra hard, so I think at some point Wallace was just frustrated with Trump.
Also I think that by constantly interrupting Biden, Trump actually saved Biden at times. The best thing you can do with Biden is let him speak.
I think Trump had a poor night. Trump needs to capture some moderates and this is not how to do it. Winning a debate against Biden is the easiest thing in the world. Trump did much better against Hillary which is silly because Hillary is fully lucid and is smarter than Biden.
yeah i agree that Biden left the radical leftists in the dust, because he backtracked on some things that his campaign has been flirting with.
Now what does this mean? Will the radical leftists still vote for him because that's as close as they can get? If they do, then Biden might have gained some centrists as well and it will serve him well. Or will the radicals be angry and him and not vote? In this case, this is a complete disaster for Biden.
I watched. I thought that Biden did a lot better than what I predicted. I thought for sure Trump would roll all over Biden, but Biden did hold his own somewhat well.
I would consider this debate a draw. A few things that Biden did well was for example look at the camera a lot, speak directly to the public. Try to put some distance between him and the radical leftists.
Trump had great points, but he really needs to stop interrupting like this. It makes him look messy and unhinged.
with just a little over a month left, do you think there are many undecideds?
?.
i was listening to a radio broadcast today, and the DJ asked one of this co-hosts who he would vote for.
Now, this person danced around the issue and clearly was avoiding answering, but after some pressure finally admitted voting for Trump. To me this is really telling and it explains much of the poll numbers we see. There is a stigma around voting for Trump, which to me rings similar to the stigma around being an atheist.
Many atheists will try to soften their position in social settings by dancing around the issue, because they feel there is a stigma associated with it and they don't want to be perceived in a negative way, even if it's logical. Voting for Trump is on this same avenue. Many people know they will vote for him, but will keep it under wraps.
for me, outside the jw context, that word seems to relate to something like a prison setting, where you're allowed to do certain things based on good behavior.
Once you step out you really start seeing how ridiculous it is. Calling pointless work as privilege. Here take this microphone and run up and down the isle for the answers on the Watchtower study. There that's your privilege.
Meanwhile the rest of the people get to sit comfortably.
