Thanks raymond ! and thanks for the link to "Updates" and the full Article. I noted two things,
One, the J.W spokesman made a silly error in saying the state could not give one example of a "child" * who suffered from the D. F'ing practice. The Lawyers will now line up a few ! * I presume a "child" in Norway is anyone under the age of 18 ?
The other thing I note is that all the objections to the Ruling ignore the salient fact that Human Rights always have precedence over religious belief and practice, or should do.
The Court is not interfering with the J.W (mis) interpretation of Scripture, they are simply upholding the Human Rights the child should have under law. J.W's are still free to interpret Scripture as they like, but not to pick one or two verses so as to ignore the Human Rights such as the Right to Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Conscience etc.
The J.W's will cherry-pick and ignore other Scriptures they could use if they chose to, and then justify all sorts of things.
They can easily say they have had some New Light, and only Adults can be DF'd , as in N.T times, those who were disciplined that way were all Adults.
Despite what some think, if this goes to the ECHR, the issue of Human Rights will beat them without further modification to their policy of Shunning.