Perry

Joined

• started 287 topics
• posted 5,495 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Perry

• 
  25

  History of Salvations: Israelites and Judahites

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my material on the history of judaeo-christian salvations became unwieldy, so i divided it into 3 parts.. i have completely rewritten part 1, dealing with the israelites and judahites.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/revolutions_part_1__israelite_judahite_salvations.pdf .

  the url links to parts 2 and 3 are provided on its page 3.. i provide the complete bibliography at the end of part 3.. doug.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Doug writes:

  No NT writer either saw or heard Jesus. We do not know who wrote the Gospels, so what were their motives?
  

  Of course they did Doug, and so will you. We all will.

  For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 5And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: 6After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.7After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles. 8And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. - 1 Cor. 15:3

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RISjr29gpaQ
  
  
• 
  25

  History of Salvations: Israelites and Judahites

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my material on the history of judaeo-christian salvations became unwieldy, so i divided it into 3 parts.. i have completely rewritten part 1, dealing with the israelites and judahites.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/revolutions_part_1__israelite_judahite_salvations.pdf .

  the url links to parts 2 and 3 are provided on its page 3.. i provide the complete bibliography at the end of part 3.. doug.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Ruby,

  Normal humans move away from pain and discomfort. They also move toward something perceived as beneficial. This is called motivation direction. One repels, one pulls.
  
  Imagining some sort of mass instantaneous masochist indulgence on the part of diverse, previously unconnected people is far more far-fetched than believing they were telling the truth about being eyewitnesses to the miracles and resurrection. Even his enemies conceded that his miracles were real. (hostile witnesses)
  
  Convinced that they had found the solution for death, having witnessed the death and resurrection... they simply saw no downside in telling others about it, since death had no hold on them.
• 
  25

  History of Salvations: Israelites and Judahites

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my material on the history of judaeo-christian salvations became unwieldy, so i divided it into 3 parts.. i have completely rewritten part 1, dealing with the israelites and judahites.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/revolutions_part_1__israelite_judahite_salvations.pdf .

  the url links to parts 2 and 3 are provided on its page 3.. i provide the complete bibliography at the end of part 3.. doug.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Why would anyone create a Creator-God whom humbled himself, washed people’s feet, rode a donkey, allowed himself to be spit on, stripped naked, beat beyond recognition, & nailed to a tree until dead... for the express purpose of being displayed in utter humiliation? Why would anyone worship a God like that in the midst of all the powerful, strike-you-down-with-lightening-bolts gods like Zeus to choose from?

  Why would his disciples gladly choose death rather than simply stop talking about him so much? Hmmm, Unless they were eye-witnesses to his miracles and resurrection.

  Time to get real Doug.
• 
  21

  A crisis of scientific reproducability

  by Outahere in

  1. social
  2. current

  https://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970.

  more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments.

  i didn't know it was so widespread...but it's a big problem in biology/medicine..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Here is an interesting article on bogus science.

  I am fascinated by those whose lives have been devastated by a cult, who then run toward anything characterized as "science" and swallow the next idea with equal fevor and gullibility.
  

  
  Real science is good stuff, it's just not done nearly as often as we would like and certainly is easily confused with bogus science by most.

  
  In the 20th century, tobacco companies paid millions and receive peer reviewed papers showing scientifically how cigarette smoking was not linked to cancer. We are starting to see the same results oriented studies about marijuana smoking since its regional legalization.
• 
  22

  Dead Wrong (A Tolerance for Ambiguity)

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is your level of tolerance for ambiguity?.

  ambiguity is a clunky, uncomfortable word, imho.. .

  ambiguity means "open to more than one interpretation".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Ooops
• 
  12

  How to start a Website?

  by DATA-DOG in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does anyone know the best way to start a website?

  is wordpress good?

  there’s going to be lots of things being sold on this site.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Try WIX is my advice.
• 
  22

  Dead Wrong (A Tolerance for Ambiguity)

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is your level of tolerance for ambiguity?.

  ambiguity is a clunky, uncomfortable word, imho.. .

  ambiguity means "open to more than one interpretation".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  In a national Barna poll, among teenagers: 83% said that moral truth depends on the circumstances and only 6% said moral truth is absolute.

  In The Closing of the American Mind, Professor Allan Bloom makes the obser­vation that “There is one thing a professor can be absolutely certain of: almost every student entering the university believes or says he believes, that truth is relative…The students, of course, cannot defend their opinion. It is something with which they have been indoctrinated” (p. 25).
  
  Indefensible and illogical non-religious beliefs about the nature of reality has been thoroughly indoctrinated into our society.
  
  Excellent subject. Thanks for posting this.
• 
  22

  Dead Wrong (A Tolerance for Ambiguity)

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is your level of tolerance for ambiguity?.

  ambiguity is a clunky, uncomfortable word, imho.. .

  ambiguity means "open to more than one interpretation".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Much more succinctly put than my previous post Morpheus!

  Lots of ideas have inherent falsehoods integrated into their thesis and do not need an empirical apparatus with which to test it.
  
  The statement "nothing is black and white" is either true or false. It cannot be said that some things are black and others are not, and still preserve the thesis.
  

  Terry says:
  
  

  I cite the above example not to rebut your reasoning, only to represent the nature of "grayness" in outcome possible in black and white reasonableness.
  
  So it does sound like at least you are suggesting that some things are "gray" when they appear black or white. So do you also make room for absolutes?
  
  Cofty says:

  Perry - That is a silly semantic trick.

  If you say so. Highlighting the illogicality of denying the usefulness of black and white thinking is beneficial, because I believe logic to be useful.

  We all use use this kind of reason everyday to try and benefit ourselves and improve our circumstances.... all perfectly normal.
  
  As previously pointed out the statement "nothing is black and white" is an inherently false statement, no doubt believed upon in a misguided attempt to improve a persons life in some way.
  
  The question is not whether or not some things are black or white (true of false); but rather which things are so.
  
  
• 
  22

  Dead Wrong (A Tolerance for Ambiguity)

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is your level of tolerance for ambiguity?.

  ambiguity is a clunky, uncomfortable word, imho.. .

  ambiguity means "open to more than one interpretation".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Everyone utilizes black and white thinking to some degree.

  If you step off the roof of a ten story building without something to defy gravity, you will fall to the ground.

  If you are shot through the heart, you will bleed.

  All airplanes in our atmosphere eventually land.

  2 + 2 = 4

  If you do not know the Japanese language, you will not be able to speak it.

  If you don't breathe, you will die.

  The claim “absolute truth does not exist” is either absolutely true or it’s not. But, of course, it can’t be absolutely true, since that would create a contradiction:

  Since it cannot be absolutely true, without making the statement false, we must concede that there are some cases in which the proposition “absolute truth does not exist” must be false…in which case, we’re back to affirming the existence of absolute truth; or as you put it "black and white thinking."

  This is an example of an absolute truth known apart from the empirical and scientific testing.
  
• 
  17

  Gordon Nehemia - Finding God's holy name with full vowels

  by Da.Furious in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i was just sent a link to a jewish scholar that apparently he has found 1,000 manuscripts with yehovah and latest discovery is one with vowels that supports the spelling yehovah.

  so this pits the myth that jews have forgotten the name into rest.. i got excited jws about the finding in support of the nwt showing the name as it should be.. just wanted to share this with you guys.. link to the blog and podcat: https://www.nehemiaswall.com/1000-manuscripts-yehovah#more-13611.

  also link to michael rood (blog:https://www.michaelrood.tv/) interview who is his friend:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Perry

  Interesting .... Thank you for posting this.