is like explaining calculus to somebody who can't count to ten.
Cofty,
For years you have started these silly posts and they all end up the same.... void of intelligent design (arguments).
Your responses predictably follow two tracts when confronted:
1. Wait on Jehovah (Scientists) - The big shots are working on it.
- Here you tacitly admit that you yourself are clueless. Since you have no science degree of any kind whatsoever, you are forced to rely on (presumably) high school level perceptions where you arbitrarily select experts and ignore the rest. This requires an extraordinary level of credulity far beyond that of simple faith.
2. I have the answer, others have the answer; but you are too ignorant to understand it.
- Here you go to the other extreme and pretend to be too intelligent and so are not required to provide any evidence what-so-ever for your ridiculous claims since no one can understand them.
- But when offered an expenses-paid vacation where you would get your chance to convince a Phd. scientist on your claim that "there is no question that cannot be answered by naturalistic methods"; you turn tail and run away. What new excuse do you have for this latest refusal to back up your claims?
Are you okay living a life where you run away from the readers of your posts like this? What are you trying to accomplish? Many people are no longer swayed by this kind of deception..... not after all the crap we went through with the Watchtower.
My challenges to you still stand:
1. Free trip to Houston to explain evolution to a Phd. Scientist who doesn't understand how it can explain life as we see it.
2. Still waiting on your explanation on how mutations and unguided natural selection can account for the caterpillar melting itself into liquid and growing new organs and body features that include flight capability.
While you determine whether or not to actually back up any of your claims, you might enjoy this little clip: