the gb's biggest lie
is that they call themselves "jehovah's witnesses"
when they are actually satanists purposely blaspheming jehovah by teaching false prophecies because they hate jehovah
they are very very naughty
FragrantAddendum
JoinedPosts by FragrantAddendum
-
7
Have Witnesses made more false prophecies then any other religion??
by Witness 007 inarmagedon in 1914 rutherford 1925 1940's the fascist catholic take over franz 1975 and 2000 the 1914 generation will not die.
now the generation that new the generation....this must break a world record of false prophecies in any religion..
-
-
-
9
Paul Gillies and JW Spellcasting July 2024
by FragrantAddendum ingillies is moving up quick.
wonder what kind of devilish acts he's done to get that job so fast.
hey, look!
-
-
FragrantAddendum
gillies is moving up quick
wonder what kind of devilish acts he's done to get that job so fast
hey, look! they put the "monster" logo in this time too!
watchtower and the wescotts go way back
https://www.goldendawnshop.com/product/enochian-tablets-westcott-style/
-
72
Coming soon: Governing Body Update #4
by ukpimo inthe upcoming governing body update, set to be released on friday this week, will feature a bearded samuel herd.. jwtalk website revealed the leak, so this thread will be used to speculate the content of the update and discuss the actual contents after its release..
-
-
FragrantAddendum
"governing body"
like, doesn't anybody in watchtower think about what that means?
the very notion of using that phrase in conjunction with the christian congregation
is anti-christ, it's against what christ taught
"you are all brothers"
stupid freakin lying masonic satanist governing body fakers
don't you guys ever get sick of working for liars?
why do liars think their god the devil is going to follow thru on his promises?
unbelievably stupid
the gb and wt hierarchy losers are going to get their "reward" for stupidity
-
35
Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...
by FragrantAddendum inso according to bible.
elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.
jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
paul was jewish
decades after jesus ascended to heaven
paul said the heavenly resurrection for other holy ones hadn't happened yet
there were many apostates promoting false stories
one false story was that people turn into spirits and go right to heaven when they die
the apostate so-called "apostolic fathers" taught such lies
like the dude who wrote "the shepherd of hermas"
what a freak!
also today, the watchtower follows in the footsteps of those first century apostates
when watchtower says "anointed ones started being resurrected to heaven at some point after 1914" they are lying
none of the "saints" have been resurrected yet
only jesus has gone from being a human to being a spirit creature in heaven
-
24
How A Prominent Watchtower Exposer Was Framed and Jailed
by Rig Boy in8: the science of body manipulation & programming .
bloodlines of the illuminati by fritz springmeier .
bloodlines of the illuminati by fritz springmeier .
-
-
FragrantAddendum
where are fritz and patricia now?
-
25
Who is this Guy?
by Slidin Fast inthe ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.
they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.
the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
hey, speaking of andrew schofield...
here's another publication he's mentioned in:
https://www.outertemple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Barry-Congregation-v-BXB-2021-4-W.L.R.-42.pdf
-
25
Who is this Guy?
by Slidin Fast inthe ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.
they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.
the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
how about this guy? lol...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnrjzFvhFI4
"schofield" starts with the "sh-" sound
just like this word...đź’©
-
35
Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...
by FragrantAddendum inso according to bible.
elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.
jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
god wanted people to know that jesus was the one appointed by god to lead the people
the signs were undeniable
the resurrection of those faithful jews moved those who witnesses it
even a pagan roman officer had to acknowledge god's power
"truly this was god's son"
especially if they were not disciples of Jesus in some manner. Explain."
jesus didn't just heal people who were his followers
he raised the widow's son without knowing him
he raised jairus' daughter without knowing her
he didn't require people to be his followers for him to help them
god is not partial
and neither is his son
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
Since when do we know what God looks like?"
i didn't say that you knew
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
Could you provide a source for your claim that the catholic church hid fragments? (a reliable one)