FragrantAddendum

Joined

• started 12 topics
• posted 385 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by FragrantAddendum

• 
  35

  Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

  by FragrantAddendum in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so according to bible.

  elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

  jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  that was an awesome grammar breakdown, @aqwsed, thank you🙂

  so again to sum up...

  the text is clear that

  when jesus died

  god did some signs to make it clear jesus was his son

  one of the signs was a really big earthquake

  one of the signs was the temple curtain ripping in two

  one of the signs was a bunch of faithful jews being resurrected in a manner similar to that with the elisha's bones resurrection thing

  the army officer attending jesus' execution and some others witnessed it

  and said "truly this was god's son"

  later after the sabbath those resurrected ones entered the city

  and other people saw them too, for a witness

  and matthew wrote about it
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  haha, whenever i see the sign of the horns...

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns#:~:text=

  The%20sign%20of%20the%20horns,fingers%20down%20with%20the%20thumb.
  

  🤘"
  

  ...it makes me think of this...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHx7_Mr4ZYc

  😆
  
  
• 
  171

  Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

  this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

  the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  i think it's hilarious

  that anyone today would want to be associated

  with the catholic church

  considering they hid

  those manuscripts all those years

  talk about freakin hypocrites

  all the religious institutions are a bunch of frauds

  the ones who claim to be "god's channel" or "popus maximus" or some other type of benefactor

  are the worst blasphemers of god's name

  stupid pope wearing special robes like he's some kind of king

  same with gb and their fake fds title

  🤮🤮🤮
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  
  
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  monsters knocking on doors all over the world

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RetJXMUaRNQ
  
• 
  51

  2024-08-August-Edition-of-Watchtower!

  by Atlantis in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  it was translated so make sure everything looks ok.. 2024-08-august-edition of watchtower magazine.. .

  https://smallpdf.com/result#r=c90d948913ed99d72872c0a1c609f388&t=share-document .

  leopold.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  ...and it goes back even further than rutherford...

  ...in russell's time...

  
  

  ...and in the time of the first century apostate so-called "apostolic fathers"...

  

  for centuries gb-style apostates have twisted the scriptures in an antichrist way in order to establish "kingdoms" now that are in opposition to what christ taught

  "one is your leader, the christ, whereas you are all brothers"

  it's cool to see all those fake kingdoms now being dissolved
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  he is funny AF

  😂
• 
  19

  BBC poor grammar - but FUNNY!

  by BoogerMan in

  1. social
  2. current

  "hamburg police shoot man with axe ahead of euros match.

  " https://www.bbc.co.uk/news.

  why don't german police just use guns?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  

  

  he means "dis-service" department

  

  gb is not faithful neither are they discreet

  they are unfaithful and brazen

  

  he means ill-legal department

  philip brumley is a law breaker

  he and his dept break both jehovah's laws and caesar's laws

  wt-land: they are poor and funny/ridiculous/morallystupid

  fakers
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  Yep AF, I think that's him, Andy Schofield. He seems to be a very competent presenter apparently an ex CS.
  

  i notice you switch around letters quite a bit

  first it was the "RA" and "RC" thing

  then the "FA" and "AF" thing

  both times it made me giggle, not in a bad way, just made me smile

  whenever i see "AF" it makes me think of this guy

  in some of his videos he wears a shirt with it on it😂

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0O_VYcsIk8
  
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  i don't know him personally

  but in my experience with wt

  they tend to promote the most slimy people to the highest positions

  (there are sincere elders around, but typically...)

  if someone is giving a prominent talk on love

  they tend to be the biggest hater

  if they are giving a talk on faith

  they tend to be the most unfaithful

  if they are giving a talk on integrity

  they tend to be the most back-stabbing s.o.b's

  it's the watchtower way

  the outside of the cup is all clean looking, sophisticated, good speaking skills/poise/etc

  the inside is filthy

  that "Ben Elder" fellow who speaks for the "european freedom" jw group is an example

  looks squeaky clean and innocent

  but his words are like a dragon burning up the poor and lowly without any remorse

  it's horrible and demonic

  so this andy dude, for him to get that position

  he's probably a big jerk with no faith in the bible and no love for truth

  that'd be the pattern, the watchtower way

  doesn't mean he can't change though