WhatshallIcallmyself

Joined

• started 1 topics
• posted 369 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by WhatshallIcallmyself

• 
  83

  The Scientific Method

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. humour

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "...care to discuss the substance???" - CG

  You should read your own resources first; that does seem to be a common ailment with creationists and the like, insofar that when they link to something other than creationist webshite nonsense their links actually say something other than they assert...

  Case in point; from your link:
  

  "It was pondering these developments that led Einstein to discover the special theory of relativity in 1905. The discovery was not momentary. The theory was the outcome of, in Einstein's own reckoning, seven and more years of work..."

  The original paper actually highlights and enlarges the bold text I've added; how did you miss this in the original?
  

  You, captaingrl, clearly (very clearly) have no understanding of how things work in science. You pretend that you do and try to buoy that notion up with words (theory) that you clearly (very clearly) do not understand. You then get ridiculed.

  
  
• 
  83

  The Scientific Method

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. humour

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "none of you guys are addressing my question" - CG

  We have. You just aren't aware that we have...

  Be honest with yourself (unless you are trolling...) about your level of knowledge on this subject...

  
  
• 
  83

  The Scientific Method

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. humour

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "DNA is like 70 years ago... evolution 150..." - CG

  So you are suggesting that our knowledge and understanding of these 2 ideas has either not improved over that period of time or that these theories have not changed...

  Based on your posts, it is quite clear that you do not understand enough about science to realise you do not understand enough about science.

  
  
• 
  83

  The Scientific Method

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. humour

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "tell me about the theory that has been discovered most recently?" - captaingrl

  Can you tell us how a theory is discovered?

  Sometimes 1 sentence can explain a lot about someone's background in education...

  
  
• 
  83

  The Scientific Method

  by cofty in

  1. social
  2. humour

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  Aeroplanes were invented over 100 years ago.

  Jet technology was discovered over 80 years ago.

  There have been no advances in aeronautics in over 50 years.

  It's stagnating I tell you!

  As an aside, there is a reason for a stagnation of life expectancy. The longer we live, the more likely it is we get an incurable disease and die from that instead (lifestyle changes are also to blame of course). You sort one thing out and we find another thing waiting in the wings to kick us in the teeth. However, slowly but surely we are living longer and that is down to medicinal breakthroughs which is, of course, down to science...

  Also, it is rare that a never seen before event happens in science nowadays. What is common however are the small incremental additions to our knowledge that never see the light of day (as far as the layman is concerned) as it only affects those directly involved in researching various things out there in the unforgiving, thankless, real world of researchers.
  
• 
  315

  Flat earth vs round earth

  by Jrjw in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.

  what are people's thoughts on this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  _Morpheus

  
  
• 
  315

  Flat earth vs round earth

  by Jrjw in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.

  what are people's thoughts on this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  MrRoboto -

  There is literally no evidence for a flat Earth. We will leave aside the fact that we can see the Earth is a sphere (for the purposes of this discussion) and instead consider that no 'evidence' that is presented for there being a flat Earth accounts for all our observations from this planet.

  The notion of a 'ball Earth' works with physical observations, the notion of a flat Earth would require a whole new set of physical explanations that explains not only ball shaped objects but flat objects also.

  In our observable Universe objects over a certain mass are ball shaped; gravity causes this. We can measure the mass of the Earth and we know this exceeds the minimum required mass to cause it to become ball shaped.

  Most flat Earthers also consider the Earth to be the centre of the Universe with everything orbiting us. That raises a whole new set of questions (such as how can galaxies move faster than the speed of light) as well as meaning the answers we already have (including verified predictions) no longer explain anything. Even maths stops working...apparently.

  But as I said at the start, we can see the Earth is a sphere therefore all suggestions that the Earth is flat have to be based either in a profound ignorance or a profound sense of troll.
  

  
  
• 
  315

  Flat earth vs round earth

  by Jrjw in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.

  what are people's thoughts on this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  'Flat Earth Theories' are a good lesson in to how language can be used to beguile people who would otherwise just laugh off such things.

  Yes we all know the Earth is not flat yet even then some of these explanations that 'prove' the Earth is flat are rather compelling; yet without some scientific knowledge and despite knowing that what you are reading is BS you can't explain away their points.

  Now consider the creationist movement and their well funded articles that frequently rear their ugly little heads over on UCD and such like webshites. If such a ludicrous and obviously false notion of a flat Earth can allow reasonably sounding arguments to be made then it suddenly becomes plainly clear why less clear cuts ideas (we can't actually see life arising and evolving in front of our eyes) can attract such a following.
• 
  78

  Pacifism is Morally Indefensible

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have been surprised recently to see so much support by ex-jws for the watchtower's refusal to fight and kill.

  in my opinion it is a vice masquerading as a virtue.

  of course war should always be a last resort but there are occasions that it has to be done.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "Pontificating from the safety of your comfortable Western lifestyle" - shadow

  You seem to have left out some adjectives commonly seen with comments like yours. Allow me to complete your sentence in a more fitting way:
  

  Pontificating from the safety of your comfortable, white privileged, patriarchal, misogynistic, cis-gendered, rape enabling Western lifestyle.
  

  No need to thank me, I understand the stress of expecting normalised social skills from someone such as yourself...

  
  
• 
  12

  Welcome me

  by natasha in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hello brothers and sisters am new here , what is the website all about ?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  WhatshallIcallmyself

  "No Brothers and Sisters here..." - ttdtt

  Maybe she meant fellow inquisitive humans...