.
Drearyweather
JoinedPosts by Drearyweather
-
44
Can you believe the opening song at the memorial tonight?!
by Indian Larry indid anybody (who went to the memorial) notice the opening song?.
keep in mind that this is the most important night of the year for the witnesses.
it is supposed to be all about jesus christ.
-
44
Can you believe the opening song at the memorial tonight?!
by Indian Larry indid anybody (who went to the memorial) notice the opening song?.
keep in mind that this is the most important night of the year for the witnesses.
it is supposed to be all about jesus christ.
-
Drearyweather
It is interesting how you find Funchbacks comments to be extreme, do you think it would be prudent of the Watchtower to be more mature, discreet, respectful and polite when people choose not to obey their instructions?
I do not agree with the WT view that all non-JW's will perish in Armageddon. Now just because the WT uses this teaching against non-JW's, does this give Funchback the liberty to comment on me and the fate of my family?
He could have simply put his views about the point I was making rather than directly go on a hostile mode towards me and my family. Had I said anything against him personally or against any other poster?
I was just replying to one poster about the song he was speaking about, not about who is getting destroyed at Armageddon and who is not. It is not polite or respectful to speak about the slaughtering of one's family especially when that person has seen 2 of his close family members die in front of him.
-
44
Can you believe the opening song at the memorial tonight?!
by Indian Larry indid anybody (who went to the memorial) notice the opening song?.
keep in mind that this is the most important night of the year for the witnesses.
it is supposed to be all about jesus christ.
-
Drearyweather
Funchback,
For your info, I was having a conversation with ambersun, not with you or other posters.
Now, since this is a discussion forum, if you disagree with what I said, you could have just stated your disagreement or your arguments for it.
But instead, you just jumped on the wagon and went on a personal tirade against me.
If that was not enough, you said that since I am associating with apostates here, me and my family would be slaughtered at Armageddon. THERE WAS SIMPLY NO NEED FOR YOU TO COMMENT ON MY FAMILY. I was just explaining my point to a poster, not abusing or arguing with anyone here.
I don't know from where did you get this idea that if one member of the family posts on such forums, the entire JW family is doomed to death. There are posters here who have active JW family members
If you disagree with anyone, simply put your opinion here and have a constructive discussion, rather than personally attacking the poster.
Take some time and read the posts of other senior posters too and learn how they have stated their disagreements.
For the matter, ambersun, (with whom I was discussing the point) was extremely respectful and polite. Learn from him.
-
16
Russian Ban exposed but not THE ARC...WHY?
by tor1500 injust your thoughts....i've been all over this site, everyone says, that if jehovah was backing the org.
then why so many things happen in the org.
child abuse, shunning, and so on....but my question or thought is why is the banning of witnesses all over the media, but the arc isn't wasn't picked up in the media, like this (oh little leaks here and there, but nothing major) nothing like the nyt or any major media venue where the friends would see it and couldn't deny it, even if they wanted to....why does the media care more about banning witnesses than child abuse...i know even if the arc was exposed many of the friends would stay, but would be shamed, because they talked about other religions...or maybe jehovah is bringing the org.
-
Drearyweather
Great comments...I like the one where someone at the NYT is a witness or knows someone...here's a thought, could the org. be paying not to have it published...would you put it past them ?
This is fine for informal discussions.
But for the benefit of lurkers here: As mentioned, this is just a theory and would need facts to back it up. We don't want to contribute towards the rumor mill and look more stupid for just assuming things to prove our point.
-
44
Can you believe the opening song at the memorial tonight?!
by Indian Larry indid anybody (who went to the memorial) notice the opening song?.
keep in mind that this is the most important night of the year for the witnesses.
it is supposed to be all about jesus christ.
-
Drearyweather
ambersun, for your comments:
Surely, a memorial of someone's death, by its very definition, should be all about remembering that person who has passed away
JW Memorial is not just a memorial service for remembering Jesus death. It is also called "The Lord's Evening Meal" and hence includes remembering those who shared the final meal with Jesus Christ during his last night and those who are included in the covenant with Jesus.
not praising a group of men who are very much alive and kicking.
The 'spirit anointed sons' mentioned in the opening song does not simply refer to 'group of men' or the governing body. It includes all anointed christians (even those who are dead now), the first century apostles of Christ and other Christians (including women). According to JW's a vast majority of such anointed ones are already dead and are in heaven.The song refers to all the 144,000 anointed ones, not just the GB
Not supporting, but just giving you the JW perspective, since we are discussing about their memorial.
-
22
You Can Encourage An Inactive Christian!
by Yesu Kristo Bwana Wangu inhttps://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-meeting-workbook/april-2017-mwb/meeting-schedule-apr10-16/encourage-inactive-christian/.
this is part of the clam meeting this week.. how contradictory is it?.
first, they instruct people to avoid inactive ones and to shun them and to treat them the same as da'd or df'd ones, .
-
Drearyweather
Yesu Kristo, regarding your comment:
first, they instruct people to avoid inactive ones and to shun them and to treat them the same as DA'd or DF'd ones,
I'm not sure about this. As far as I am aware, Inactive ones are those who have not turned in their FS reports for more than 6 months. In other words, they are those who have stopped coming to meetings or preaching, without officially sending a letter of DA. Are inactive ones actually shunned or treated as disfellowshipped ones? Since you have used the word 'they instruct people', can you please provide sources where JWs are told to shun and avoid inactive ones?
-
17
Memorial - from disgusted to feeling sorry
by UBM101 ini went with my husband tonight for the first time.
it was pretty appalling how they lied about the 144k and everyone else.
then passing the wine and bread for nothing.
-
Drearyweather
Thanks. I know about these sources. But can't use it against them.
I was actually interested in knowing whether WT has made any direct statements in recent times, from official sources. (i.e. without using the words 'may be', 'could be', 'we don't know' etc)
-
17
Memorial - from disgusted to feeling sorry
by UBM101 ini went with my husband tonight for the first time.
it was pretty appalling how they lied about the 144k and everyone else.
then passing the wine and bread for nothing.
-
Drearyweather
stuckinarut2,
Can you please provide the link or source of the Kingdom Ministry where JW's have mentioned that this would be their last memorial? 2014 and 1970?
I am currently discussing this with a family member
-
14
Victims of "political repression"
by biblexaminer inpolitical repression is the persecution of an individual or group within society for political reasons, particularly for the purpose of restricting or preventing their ability to take part in the political life of a society thereby reducing their standing among their fellow citizens.[1][2].
so, the governing bastards feel that putin is trying to keep jehovah's witnesses out of politics.
interesting.... all the russians had to do is to ask watchtower one question.
-
Drearyweather
Political violence is a particular form of repression involving the use of physical force to achieve political goals.
Yes, to achieve the goals of the one who is committing the violence, not the victim
Where does it say that you are a victim of political repression only if you are a member of a political party? Individuals with no political affiliation can also become victims of political repression.
I never told that fining someone for speeding is an act of political repression. But stripping a person of his basic rights by using brutality and criminalizing is political repression.
From your own article:
. Acts of repression and/or political violence often violate fundamental human rights, and are sometimes referred to as human rights abuse.
If a group of JW's are arrested and trashed by the state for coming together and praying or discussing the Bible, they become victims of Political Violence and State Repression.
The wave of violence that engulfed JWs during the Nazi and Soviet regime is also classified under political repression and human rights abuse.
-
51
RUSSIA: (7 April 2017) Day 3 - Jehovah's Witnesses hearing under way
by Drearyweather inin moscow, a soft rain drizzles.
along the facade of the supreme court stretched a large queue of those who came to the process as listeners.
a large bus is parked at the courthouse on povarskaya street, full of obviously bored police officers.
-
Drearyweather
So the Russian JW's can have the memorial on 11th April before the court resumes on 12th