Island Man et al told the truth about the policy regarding taking whole blood:
a person who is found to have unrepentantly accepted blood is disassociated from the congregation.There's practically no difference between that and disfellowshipping. The distinction that Watchtower is attempting to make is purely for technical legal reasons.
This was changed after the Bulgarian scandal regarding blood.
See: http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/bulgaria-blood-transfusions.php
I remember a CO explaining this during his visit. He told in one of his talks that someone disassociates himself after taking whole blood instead of being disfellowshipped. During the late 90's, I was still running the extra mile for the borg (reg. pioneer) and still too brainwashed (and unaware of the rise of the first sites critical of WT) to ask why the policy was changed regarding blood and not regarding idolatry, adultery etc. God, if I only had known how opportunistic the borg has been in so many cases.
Good thing there is still common sense among so many JW's who refuse the WT refusal of blood! Doesn't this indicate there is hope, one day the bubble has to burst! What if half of the borg would leave at a certain point?