QC

Joined

• started 10 topics
• posted 373 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by QC

• 
  40

  Now that I am out, which bible should i read? Feeling free at last!

  by Freethinking76 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so, now that i am out for good, which bible should i read?

  there is no way i will read the wt one..so i still want to have a relationship with god but don't know how to choose a bible.

  it is very hard to dewired yourself and ,sometimes i feel that i don't have a relationship with him.the what ifs come and go still.last night i was up all night reading and researching , can't shake off the shock still to know ttatt.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  freethink,

  I use all translations. NIV is descent usually. Invariably though, all translation will miss the Hebrew and Greek to some degree. It's fun to figure out which comes closest to original sense (not words, but understanding).

  This cradle of translations comes with descent commentary:

  http://biblehub.com/luke/17-20.htm

  It's natural to wonder about other religious groups. Your silver is, although JWs went way wrong, you do have familiarity with the Bible which is an asset. Just as JWs are off on their view of Jesus so is 4th century theology . So, be careful of similar traps.

  Bottom line is, INDIVIDUALLY we have access to practicing the original 1st Century Christianity. It takes study diligence. Be a modern Berean. Many of us here at JWN are diligent about Bible understanding. Flag us down anytime.

  One of the exciting things you should know is, ALL deciples of Jesus are of the anointed. There are many posts on that subject.

  One other thing, you will have to tolerate those intolerant of the Bible and God.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Cog,

  Thanks for your views. It helps with clarity.

  Appreciate how serious this fossil record problem is?

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caUKGHPpAVE

  Do you expect all evolution to happen at a constant slow and gradual rate? Have you considered that the speed of evolutionary change can be different depending on the environment?... Also consider that fossilization is a rare event (and finding them even rarer), so if evolution happened quickly during that time period, we shouldn't expect to find fossils capturing the intermidate forms.

  Yes, I expect you to show what Neo-Darwinian Evolution theory predicts, gradualism, transmutations (punctuated equilibrium) and how life began (after help from discredited mud puddle magic, abiogenesis). SCIENCE and me expects you to prove full blown Darwinian Evolution, early life is your best (clear easy to see) shot at proving it. You can't punt. Missing fossil means theory is wrong (not fossils are missing).

  The PreCambrian period last ~1,000,000,000 (BILLION) years, that's PLENTY of FOSSIL TIME (the Cambrian period above has voluminous fossils in only a 5-6 MILLION year window). Also, many invertebrate soft-tissue fossils are found in PreCambrian strata. Problem is, they don't support a "common ancestry" fossil tree (with vast of smooth transitional life models).

  We can't underestimate what the stark contrast between the Cambrian and Precambrian strata mean. It's a demarcation thunder clap announcing a special transcendent event.

  This video touches on where you live, Trilobites at Burgess Shale (fascinating).

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=SyEHNg1O3QM&feature=endscreen

  It uses molecular clock dating and data from 62 genes from 122 taxa to infer the phylogenetic relationships and approximate time of divergence.

  This is numerology 2520/1914-style gimmick. Fossils don't support a "divergence." That's the bottom line. If the fossils don't fit...Evolution is done.

  What do the latest finds at Maotianshan Shale (Chengjiang, China) show?

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8USBI0GSSOA&feature=fvwp

  Conclusion: The fossil records show life arrives on earth in various columns (with species diversity within limits). These columns stay in their lanes and NEVER cross. DNA and Epigenetic software instructive INFORMATION explains the various life assimilations, not Darwinian Evolution.

  

  Darwinian fossil record shows bursts of life erupt in the various Earth strata. There is no smooth gradualism life forms. (to prove Evolution)
  
  Conjecture that a "universal common descent tree" (grey circles) exist in the PreCambrian strata is a MYTH.

  PreCambrian Soft-Tissue Fossils: Bacteria, Sponges, Embryos, Bizarre Plants

  

  Transition fossils don't exist because the Evolution theory is simply false.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  We know definitively there is NO “common ancestry” fossil tree coming out of the Precambrian strata. Fossils supporting this fictitious idea do not exist. That’s what's “current.”
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  @ Capt O,

  I curious about your thoughts on the Cambrian explosion before this book came out

  This thread is a focus on current evidence updates in regard to evolution, which I find amazing when one considers the way Evolution is presented as an infallible "fact." This dogmatism is so reminiscent of JWism (“we’re the true religion”) I’m NOT going give it a “wait of Jehovah” pass.

  Yes, Evolution dogma is shockingly false just like JW dogma is. A theists cannot be allowed to highjack this thread by using personal ad hominem to silence those simply shining light on another house of cards ready to collapse (like the bully JW leadership).

  Hi jg,

  Thanks for the spellcheck. You're an unpretentious person with lots of friends. We can tell.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Cap, sharing this is to encourage you to rethink your position.

  That would be the lesson if there were any new information available. Instead we have the same old crap from creationists.

  Atheist Professor Thomas Nagel has regrets from embracing a Darwinian worldview because of the latest (NEW) fresh reexamination of the Neo-Darwinian theory, which exposes it as an inept explanation for life on earth. It’s not unusual for MANY with an indoctrination (like Darwinism) to later realize it’s false. History shows this can happen often, like I said before, e.g. JWism, Nazism and Marxist Leninist Communism.

  The S.C. Meyer's Darwin’s Doubt influence undoubtedly contributed to Professor Nagel’s awakening.

  Also note some of the main stream reviews sympathetic to Nagel's dissatisfaction with a strictly materialistic Darwinian worldview.

  New Book: Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False

  Professor Thomas Nagel

  BA in philosophy ( Cornell University ,
  BPhil ( University of Oxford)
  PhD in philosophy ( Harvard University)

  Barnes & Nobel Overview

  The modern materialist approach to life has conspicuously failed to explain such central mind-related features of our world as consciousness, intentionality, meaning, and value. This failure to account for something so integral to nature as mind, argues philosopher Thomas Nagel, is a major problem, threatening to unravel the entire naturalistic world picture, extending to biology, evolutionary theory, and cosmology.

  Since minds are features of biological systems that have developed through evolution, the standard materialist version of evolutionary biology is fundamentally incomplete. And the cosmological history that led to the origin of life and the coming into existence of the conditions for evolution cannot be a merely materialist history, either. An adequate conception of nature would have to explain the appearance in the universe of materially irreducible conscious minds, as such.

  Nagel's skepticism is not based on religious belief or on a belief in any definite alternative. In Mind and Cosmos, he does suggest that if the materialist account is wrong, then principles of a different kind may also be at work in the history of nature, principles of the growth of order that are in their logical form teleological rather than mechanistic.

  In spite of the great achievements of the physical sciences, reductive materialism is a world view ripe for displacement. Nagel shows that to recognize its limits is the first step in looking for alternatives, or at least in being open to their possibility.

  Reviews

  "[This] troublemaking book has sparked the most exciting disputation in many years... I like Nagel's mind and I like Nagel's cosmos. He thinks strictly but not imperiously, and in grateful view of the full tremendousness of existence." -- Leon Wieseltier, The New Republic

  "A sharp, lucidly argued challenge to today's scientific worldview." -- Jim Holt, The Wall Street Journal

  "Nagel's arguments against reductionism should give those who are in search of a reductionist physical 'theory of everything' pause for thought... The book serves as a challenging invitation to ponder the limits of science and as a reminder of the astonishing puzzle of consciousness." -- Science

  " Mind and Cosmos , weighing in at 128 closely argued pages, is hardly a barn-burning polemic. But in his cool style Mr. Nagel extends his ideas about consciousness into a sweeping critique of the modern scientific worldview." -- The New York Times

  "His important new book is a brief but powerful assault on materialist naturalism... [Nagel has] performed an important service with his withering critical examination of some of the most common and oppressive dogmas of our age." -- The New Republic

  "[This] short, tightly argued, exacting new book is a work of considerable courage and importance." -- National Review

  " Provocative... Reflects the efforts of a fiercely independent mind." -- H. Allen Orr, The New York Review of Books

  "Challenging and intentionally disruptive... Unless one is a scientific Whig, one must strongly suspect that something someday will indeed succeed [contemporary science]. Nagel's Mind and Cosmos does not build a road to that destination, but it is much to have gestured toward a gap in the hills through which a road might someday run." -- The Los Angeles Review of Books

  "A model of carefulness, sobriety and reason... Reading Nagel feels like opening the door on to a tidy, sunny room that you didn't know existed." -- The Guardian

  "Fascinating... [A] call for revolution." -- Alva Noe, NPR's 13.7

  "The book's wider questions - its awe-inspiring questions - turn outward to address the uncanny cognizability of the universe around us. ... He's simply doing the old-fashioned Socratic work of gadfly, probing for gaps in what science thinks it knows." -- Louis B. Jones, The Threepenny Review

  "[Attacks] the hidden hypocrisies of many reductionists, secularists, and those who wish to have it both ways on religious modes of thinking ... Fully recognizes the absurdities (my word, not his) of dualism, and thinks them through carefully and honestly."--Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution
• 
  47

  Preview of Forum vNext - "Return of JWD"

  by Simon in

  1. forum
  2. announcements

  meh, what the heck ... some people already noticed / discovered it anyway .... i put a preview of the new site up on the original .com domain if anyone wants to try it:.

  http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/.

  it is incomplete but should show some of the new features.. right now the home page shows topics for the entire site which you can sort by when they were started, last updated or the number of posts (rating will come later).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Simon,

  New site looks great!

  icons at either side of the subjects too much and makes it look quite cluttered.

  Left poster avatars are fine.

  On the right side, instead of three, how about a cycle thru icons ability, you can cycle left or right (one at a time).
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Hi jg, you're a doll.

  There were similar "explosions" of diversification

  Great point!

  Yes, this is the take away for the fossil record. Life on earth arrives in abrupt burst, various plants, animals, etc., and then humans.

  Over and over again it reminds us Evolution gradualism and transmutation as well as mud puddle magic (abiogenesis) is NOT in the fossil record.

  So, DNA and Epigenetic INFORMATION loom large as the answer, the key way to explain the various life assimilations.

  
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Thanks for sharing.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Cap,

  Slow down. Discussion is impossible if you are going to be hysterical. The Bible and Noble Prize have nothing to do with this.

  We know Evolution (gradualism and transmutation) and mud puddle magic (abiogenesis) is not viable. Science says when something is not viable (has anomaly glitches), waste no more time, move on.

  So, looking at the evidence, what theory best explains the Cambrian Explosion? All science tools must be available to solve this. This means informatics science, the best tool to explain instructions and messaging evidence found in the Cambrian Explosion DNA and Epigenetic software, must be used. We can’t exclude science simply because it goes some place ideologically we might not like—with regrets that’s how Einstein handles the rude awakening of the expanding universe and quantum mechanics.

  Let chips fall where they may, accept it, learn and move on. That's the lesson.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  QC

  Cap

  have you ever read any books that actually explain evolution?

  I was thoroughly educated in Evolution. I understand all its arguments.

  Hear me out:

  When you learned Steady State theory (eternal universe) was wrong and the correct understanding is the Big Bang theory (universe beginning origin), after understanding you accepted this change. True?

  That's exactly what’s going on with Evolution as explained here, Post 211 of 224

  Cambrian Explosion proves Evolution is wrong. Life arrives exactly opposite (reverse) of Evolution. More complex life arrives first, AND THEN came small-scale variations.

  So you have to adjust your understanding of life’s origin, just as you warmed up to the Universe having a beginning origin.

  This is new; older books have the older understanding (obsolete).

  Please read Darwin’s Doubt, get current.