"with enough provisions to last for six months".
I'd love to see that bag .
i am sure that this has already been discussed, so maybe someone could direct me to the correct link.
i just haven't been able to access this site as often as i would like.
at the meeting tonight (i wasn't there but was told about it), the brothers were told to pack up a "survival kit" with enough provisions to last for six months - water, medications etc.
"with enough provisions to last for six months".
I'd love to see that bag .
according to the live blog: god's will to be completed by the end of the millennium.
very casually said by louche (;-)).
i think this is one of those things that is supposed to rile up the r&f.
A millennium (plural millennia or millenniums) is a period of time equal to one thousand years. (from wiki)
it wasn't pretty, it wasn't how we wanted it but we are in england and it rains here.
you can't argue with two good wins previously.
can the aussies rescue their pride for the rest of the series?.
Sorry, I missed it. To be honest, I really don’t bother with these two minnows .
i mean we aussie team has 583 runs to get in our last innings after england declared with 3 wickets in hand.
.
Pfft... Australia 47 all out, Nov 9 - 11, 2011.
(edit: sorry about that - i clicked submit before i finished writing the post.
and its now 11 years, not 10. anyway...).
hi folks.
Is it just me, or are the numbers identical for 2002 and 2004(yearbook stats by field 2002-2012)?
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/16/us-safrica-cardinal-idusbre92f09a20130316.
johannesburg | sat mar 16, 2013 11:54am edt.
(reuters) - a south african cardinal who helped elect pope francis this week has told the bbc pedophilia is an illness and not a crime.. cardinal wilfrid fox napier, the catholic archbishop of durban, told bbc radio 5 on saturday that pedophilia was a "disorder" that needed to be treated.. "from my experience, pedophilia is actually an illness.
Not that I'm catholic(not even close), but I think we should read the whole story here. He was speaking of abusers who themselves abuse. It seems as if the journalist ambushed him here.
Now before I get flamed, I don’t necessarily agree with him, nor do I consider myself knowledgeable of the subject so as to give 'expert views'.
I have two kids of my own and find any child abuse disgusting and without excuse.
I just don’t think we should judge if we don’t know the whole story, al la witness style...
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/SA-cardinal-apologises-for-controversial-comments-20130318
i must admit, i am a sucker for bible movies.
i do not get the history channel on my cable service but i've heard good things about the series.. have you seen it?.
are you interested in these types of programs..
"EP's approach to debating is similar to a drive-by shooting where he misses all his targets but speeds away with satisfaction thinking he's a bad-ass gangster."
"knowledge puffs up, but love builds up" (sorry, not sure where this one is in bible).
"do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthing man, to whom no salvation belongs.
(psalms 146:4-6 or something like that).
John 15:15 - "No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.(NASB)
Faithful and discreet what?
ok, can someone please tell me, what in the world do these women have on their faces???.
i couldn't find that it said where this was taken, but i'm guessing it's in myanmar as that is the featured country in the yearbook.
for context, here's a scan of the entire cover:.
Egg?
the announcement was something like "[name] got checked".well if he ain't got df'ed then what does this mean?is it based on the bible?where does this policy come from?how is the rest of the congregation supposed to behave to that person in a situation like this?what happened in the background anyway?is he checked for a period of time or what?any restrictions?.
They would typically mark someone for doing something that is not as bad as a DF offence, but still wrong in their eyes, like dating a non believer. Basically it is to warn others that the now marked person is a bad influence and only limited association is allowed. Didn’t know they announce it though?
Have I got that right?