Sub COs are all the rage these days, they get credited hours for their pioneering but still have to have jobs and pay for their own housing cars ect. So more free labour for WTower. I can see them pushing all these sub COs more and more as it costs nothing unlike full COs which need a accommodation and cars being paid for.
Mikejw
JoinedPosts by Mikejw
-
62
So what happens next...
by Farmer Jim1 inwith what is arguably the biggest change to jw life in recent decades (the scrapping of publishers counting hours) what does this lead to?.
in my mind these are the results;.
1) a massive decrease in 'preaching hours'.
-
-
-
773
Breaking News: Anthony Morris III no longer serving on the Governing Body
by WingCommander inthis has been announced on the jw's official website, in the "jw news" section.
this is not a joke.
anthony moron da turd is out as a gluttonous body member!
-
-
Mikejw
Yes the full implications of JWLITE will anger those who have been breaking their backs for decades. Some hardliners made so many sacrifices and were knocking on doors pioneering for 100hrs month until they were exhausted. Then we still got loads of telling off CAN YOU DO EVEN MORE.
If you wake up at 4am and do Bible study can you wake up at 3am and try to work one day a week less to spend more hours for watchtower
-
22
Join JW's or DIE - soon!!!
by BoogerMan inw72 10/1 p. 607 - "they (jw's) know that soon now all who are not true worshipers of jehovah (jw's) will be destroyed.".
how quickly half a century passes by!
2 peter 3:8 - "...one day is with jehovah jw.borg as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.
-
-
Mikejw
Some have suggested JWs have hired professional PR companies to come up with ideas to stop the bleeding. This makes sense when you think about all the change’s lately.
-
31
Latest jw broadcast referring to allegations of protecting pedophiles
by jonahstourguide inhi folks.. i put this in abuse as i thought it relevant.. a physically in mentally out friend that considers our friendship greater than religion told me that on the latest broadcast steven lett alluded to satans voice being behind people that claim the organisation protects pedophiles.. my friend then went on to say they must be in damage control.. he added, but that is correct, they are hiding their internal records.
is not that construed as protecting the accused?.
if i get the inclination i may post a snippet of what was actually said.. sadly my friend is trying to protect his family relationships and so goes along with the charade.. his situation weighs on me but, as many of you here know, it can be a difficult road to travel.. jtg.
-
-
Mikejw
It’s not like it used to be when I was growing up
they used to just say don’t take any literature from apostates which you hardly ever had the opportunity to do anyway
now the internet changes everything, you can look at both sides of any subject and make your own mind up
My favourite video the Borg ever made was whiteboard video about smoking, the best line ever was “no thanks I’ve checked out the risks and it’s not for me”
well this applies to any organisation that pushes being fully vaccinated so hard and act like salesmen for big pharma
-
31
Latest jw broadcast referring to allegations of protecting pedophiles
by jonahstourguide inhi folks.. i put this in abuse as i thought it relevant.. a physically in mentally out friend that considers our friendship greater than religion told me that on the latest broadcast steven lett alluded to satans voice being behind people that claim the organisation protects pedophiles.. my friend then went on to say they must be in damage control.. he added, but that is correct, they are hiding their internal records.
is not that construed as protecting the accused?.
if i get the inclination i may post a snippet of what was actually said.. sadly my friend is trying to protect his family relationships and so goes along with the charade.. his situation weighs on me but, as many of you here know, it can be a difficult road to travel.. jtg.
-
-
Mikejw
There is also this new Jade and Nita video to use Jades words “not to look at anything negative about my beliefs”
-
147
Smoking gun GB can’t get out of this one
by Mikejw inhere in 2022 if anyone says anything against the vaccines even a little bit you are almost apostate.. someone once mentioned all vaccinated sports stars collapsing and someone else said not to speak badly about the gb or by extension jehovah.. the gb can’t get out of this one, it’s gone too far.
it’s now the case that if you speak against the vaccines you are speaking against the gb and by extension jehovah .
-
-
Mikejw
As I had a pregnant wife at the start of the Governing body really pushing them, and then a feeding mother I chose to go against the GBs direction but not tell anyone
to me this is the smoking gun. They can not be directed by Jehovah. They can not be Jehovahs one channel and Jehovah did not help get all these pregnant and feeding mothers to get these injections
We now know of multiple fully vaccinated couples who have lost babies and had babies born with serious complications
-
147
Smoking gun GB can’t get out of this one
by Mikejw inhere in 2022 if anyone says anything against the vaccines even a little bit you are almost apostate.. someone once mentioned all vaccinated sports stars collapsing and someone else said not to speak badly about the gb or by extension jehovah.. the gb can’t get out of this one, it’s gone too far.
it’s now the case that if you speak against the vaccines you are speaking against the gb and by extension jehovah .
-
-
Mikejw
stan livedeath18 hours ago
Mikejw--i ask you again--are you an elder NOW
-
Stan sorry I if I missed your question before yes I am still an elder but I am PIMA, physically in mentally agnostic.
But if anyone knew I went against GB direction not to be fully vaccinated then I would lose privileges
until I see proof of evolution or of another belief then I view it just as I view the Bible that it may be right or it may not be I just dont know
-
147
Smoking gun GB can’t get out of this one
by Mikejw inhere in 2022 if anyone says anything against the vaccines even a little bit you are almost apostate.. someone once mentioned all vaccinated sports stars collapsing and someone else said not to speak badly about the gb or by extension jehovah.. the gb can’t get out of this one, it’s gone too far.
it’s now the case that if you speak against the vaccines you are speaking against the gb and by extension jehovah .
-
-
Mikejw
Jan, serious question.
What would you say to a pregnant or nursing mother who asks you should she follow the direction from the governing body and by extension Jehovah to be fully vaccinated?
by the sound of it you would say to her yes the vaccines are safe and effective be fully vaccinated?
this to me is absolutely dangerous and you would have blood on your hands just as those fat old men in world headquarters now do.
-
27
Did the Watchtower Society ban Vaccinations and Organ Transplants?
by Vanderhoven7 inan avid wts supporter writes:.
re: vaccinations: vaccinations have never been banned.
if they were, then no representative of the wts would have been allowed to travel overseas when vaccines were compulsory around 1920 when vaccines was regularly in the news, there was both positive and negative information printed in the golden age (forerunner of the awake) but not from the staff writers, but from out side sources of article by medical doctors at the time and others that responded to those articles.. re: organ transplants: organ transplants were never forbidden by the society.
-
-
Mikejw
Vanderhoven711 hours ago
An avid WTS supporter writes:
RE: VACCINATIONS: Vaccinations have never been banned. . If they were, then no representative of the WTS would have been allowed to travel overseas when vaccines were compulsory Around 1920 when vaccines was regularly in the news, there was both positive and negative information printed in the Golden Age (forerunner of the Awake) but NOT from the staff writers, but from out side sources of article by medical doctors at the time and others that responded to those articles.
RE: ORGAN TRANSPLANTS: Organ transplants were never forbidden by the Society. Like vaccinations, organ transplants have always been up to the individual.
Is he right or wrong?
-
where red did this come from?
he is wrong to say its up to the individual because you would lose privileges if you dont stay fully vaccinated. So this is not up to the individual.
if you don’t follow the direction to be fully vaccinated you are going against the GB and by extension Jehovah.
-
147
Smoking gun GB can’t get out of this one
by Mikejw inhere in 2022 if anyone says anything against the vaccines even a little bit you are almost apostate.. someone once mentioned all vaccinated sports stars collapsing and someone else said not to speak badly about the gb or by extension jehovah.. the gb can’t get out of this one, it’s gone too far.
it’s now the case that if you speak against the vaccines you are speaking against the gb and by extension jehovah .
-
-
Mikejw
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/covid-19-injections-in-pregnant-women-lead-to-8x-increase-in-spontaneous-abortions-and-3x-increase-in-stillbirths.-a48c57af
Bart, they evidence is clear these jabs are horrifically harmful for women or anyone pregnant of not, and this is why the official government advisory U turn now saying the opposite of the current Governing Body direction.
-
this is is good question to ask the organisation?
As you probably know there has been a U turn on official government direction now saying pregnant and nursing mothers should also not be vaccinated. Link attached.Many brothers and sisters are confused as the direction from the governing body is to be fully vaccinated and we have had many reminders to obey directions from the organisation even if they go against government directions.Please could you clarify will there be new directions along with official government directions or should pregnant and feeding mothers still follow the GB directions and go against the governments new directions?Toxicity conclusionsThe absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available. In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern. Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential, pregnant women and breastfeeding women has been provided in both the Information for UK Healthcare Professionals and the Information for UK recipients.