Ooooh. Talkorigens. What a surprise!!!
Sheesh...why don't you believe anything? Are you ALWAYS right? Everyone else is STOOOPID? At least, that's what y'all keep saying.
Want me to list a bunch of always atheist pals of yours?
sorry, i don't have time to search the site right now.
this bloody french isp is rubbish, and i keep getting dropped when i try anything that takes more than 10 seconds.
has the society ever come up with any intelligent reasoning to counter the ages that carbon dating/science has given to various artifacts, i.e.
Ooooh. Talkorigens. What a surprise!!!
Sheesh...why don't you believe anything? Are you ALWAYS right? Everyone else is STOOOPID? At least, that's what y'all keep saying.
Want me to list a bunch of always atheist pals of yours?
i have received inquiries about how i was trained by spirit as a psychologist.
i was led to many sources of enlightenment.
books routinely was i led to that it was important i read.
Why this test is wrong. At least for me.
I will list my fav color I chose and the supposed explainations, with my COLOR commentary on my first choice. Maybe I'll do the other ones too later....Anyway, My favorite color is Violet/Purple.
1.
"preferred Violet indicates you are a people pleaser driven to influence by means of your great charm. You are suffering from the ill effects of sustained stress in your life. It also indicates the great likehood of some real or imagined childhood abuse. This type person is given to fantasy or daydreaming in which he can create a world that is more to his liking."
I'm about as charming as a viper. Well, if I was a car, I guess that would count. (I love Dodge Vipers) I am straight forward and often blunt, which is surely not a quality of charm. That's good and bad. I have no stress in my life. My greatest stress is probably hoping I pass my bowels OK in the morning. As far as childhood abuse goes, it is neither real or imagined in my life. Fantasy and daydreaming? I think that encompasses just about everyone, and if they have the power and will (whether theirs or Someone else's) to make the world around them more to their liking, surely they/I would do it. Nothing like making your dreams come true I always say. I like Violet/purple because it's, well, like a color I could bathe in. It has lovely depth. It is the color of my birthstone, as I was born in February. I am an artsy fartsy kinda guy, and designing and making jewelry is one of my artistic endeavors that I have been doing for many years. One of the most breathtaking stones I have seen is a piece of Amethyst from Africa. It was like looking into heaven. Though, Tanzanite, real gemy stuff, is on par with more blue with violet undertones.
Purple. It's royal. It's Kingly. It's Queenly. It's Stately. It's got something slightly Romantic to it. It's a Renaissance color that makes me feel Monet, Van Gogh and Renoit all at the same time.
i have received inquiries about how i was trained by spirit as a psychologist.
i was led to many sources of enlightenment.
books routinely was i led to that it was important i read.
Did you find the test at all accurate?
Nope.
sorry, i don't have time to search the site right now.
this bloody french isp is rubbish, and i keep getting dropped when i try anything that takes more than 10 seconds.
has the society ever come up with any intelligent reasoning to counter the ages that carbon dating/science has given to various artifacts, i.e.
Naturalists started out as Creationists
Hogwash. Most naturalists were always atheists.
i would not have posted this, but the subject just doesn't go away.
i would like to comment on the differences in the two men.
first of all, they come from different eras.
Ray and Bill's excellent adventure.
i have received inquiries about how i was trained by spirit as a psychologist.
i was led to many sources of enlightenment.
books routinely was i led to that it was important i read.
0-gray 1-blue 2-green 3-red
4-yellow 5-violet 6-brown 7-black
52317064
Least fav: yellow
~...Who was trained not to spit in the fan, who was told what to do by the man...who was given a pat on the back...who was breaking away from the pack..who was dragged down by the stone. - Pink Floyd ~
Edited by - pomegranate on 26 October 2002 20:54:57
more than any time in history respect and the awe of god has seriously eroded .
man has taken creation for granted and have allowed themselves to believe that no intelligence was required in the making of the universe.
random impersonal forces they delude themselves could have caused all we see in the universe.
God does. ooops. I'll whisper... god does
and for those reasons, coj wanted in the beginning, to stay with the organization, just like bill bowens.
that is all carl wanted.
yes, as members of the governing body, they knew full well, exactly what carl's writings meant.
Rom 3:4
Let God be true, and every man a liar.
more than any time in history respect and the awe of god has seriously eroded .
man has taken creation for granted and have allowed themselves to believe that no intelligence was required in the making of the universe.
random impersonal forces they delude themselves could have caused all we see in the universe.
Do me a favor, give me a real science site. I read all that talkorigin crap, it's bogus BS.
That's ALL you guys on this forum bank on, talkorigins. Oh yeah, the final word on evolution.
Here's what these guys call facts from talkorigens:
"The term "transitional fossil" is used at least two different ways on talk.origins, often leading to muddled and stalemated arguments.
"The major point of these general lineages is that animals with intermediate morphology existed at the appropriate times, and thus that the transitions from the proposed ancestors are fully plausible."
Oh yeah. Facts baby. Factual transistions are bound in MUDDLED and STALEMATED arguments. Transistions are PLAUSIBLE? That's means there aren't any.
"Most transitional fossils are only mentioned in the primary literature, often buried in incredibly dense and tedious "skull & bones" papers utterly inaccessible to the general public."
Why is that? Because it's BS that's why. Oh, here's a good one:
"And finally, many of the species-to-species transitions were described too recently to have made it into the books yet."
Yep. Too fresh and hot out of the earth to publish all it's glorious transitional truth. Wait, there's more:
"Why don't paleontologists bother to popularize the detailed lineages and species-to-species transitions? Because it is thought to be unnecessary detail."
First they say it's too new, then they say it's unnecessary deatil. Kewl. The core proof of evolution, TRANSITIONS (like an eye partially developed) is an UNNECESSARY DETAIL?? Otay. Time to do the old soft shoe shuffley shuffley doooo doooo....Wait!! There's more:
"Paleontologists clearly consider the occurrence of evolution to be a settled question, so obvious as to be beyond rational dispute, so, they think, why waste valuable textbook space on such tedious detail?"
It's their own private Idaho. WE KNOW, why should we let THEM know. We'd be wasting textbook space. HAHAHAHA!!! This person is a classic BS artist!!!
"GAP: Ideally, of course, we want an entire skeleton from the middle Late Devonian, not just limb fragments. Nobody's found one yet."
Cause it doesn't exist. Read this one:
"So far this series is known only as a series of genera or families; the transitions from species to species are not known."
So, if you go to this site, and look at all those BIG SCIENTIFIC NAMES in the divisions, they are ALL the same KINDS. Species to species transitions ARE NON EXISTANT, and they HAVE TO ADMIT IT THEMSELVES.
Edited by - pomegranate on 25 October 2002 23:9:45
more than any time in history respect and the awe of god has seriously eroded .
man has taken creation for granted and have allowed themselves to believe that no intelligence was required in the making of the universe.
random impersonal forces they delude themselves could have caused all we see in the universe.
List the hundreds of transitions and the pictures and data behind them. Surely, they must be all over the net.
If you want good data on the flood, go check out hooberus on the carbon dating thread. He knows more than me in that regard. As I have siad before, geology ain't my bag.