Listening to him speak and having
read nearly every one of his books I think it's pretty hard not to come
to the conclusion Bart Erhman is an atheist.
He's disingenuous and knows which side his bread is buttered on.
I've read all his books and I never came to the conclusion that he was an Atheist.
Is it possible that bias (a tendency to
believe that some people, ideas, etc., are "What YOU believe to be so)------, rather than accepting what A person straight out says his persona belief is)-- In Barth's case he says he is Agnostic, why should anyone believe otherwise?
As far as his bread and butter, Bart had all the needed credentials of a certified New Testament Ph D Scholar and had all the opportunities to teach at any University of his choice with a nice salary and Tenure. He was Never in need of any monies.
His choice to openly become agnostic is no different than many JW who chose to renounce the Watchtower faith at the cost of losing all family, friends and any networks.
He did not go PIMO for fear of losing his family like most jws. He had the courage to Openly renounce Christianity regardless. That is braver than any Jw PIMOs who is afraid to come clean for fear of the repercussions.
The books he started writing was even braver considering they would prick at his former friends and cause a division.
The fact that his books have inspired hundreds of millions is just an added bonus to his courage on bucking the system.