Seems like they're using the old "innocent on a technicality" defence. In this case the term "in care". Although there are plenty examples of the abuse of vulnerable people by people following WT rules, since they don't operate care homes and other facilities, they are arguing that they shouldn't have been named in an enquiry into "abuse in care".
This is the old #@*&s of the GB once again bragging that the WT doesn't provide material help to anybody ๐๐