Hiho
SAB
Hello, mP. I do not believe that snakes represent the Devil across the board. However within the Biblical framework snakes represent the devil. This is always the case. You keep asking for scriptures when I do not believe the Bible contains scriptures. It contains stories and old laws, no scriptures. The Bible IS Scripture, but that is another topic altogether. What you call a contaminante is actually just a misapplication of the Bible Document in foreign lands. Snakes are not bad inside or outside of literature, I cannot stress this enough. Only within the Biblical Framework are snakes considered the Devil.
Revelation 12 - 9 The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray. He was hurled to the earth, and his angels with him.
Revelation 20 - 2 He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent , who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.
MP
Firstly Genesis refers to a literal snake, while the two revelation scriptures are metaphysical. An actual snake creature cannot also be a dragon.
The main reason that you are wrong is because the Book of Revelation is not a book of prophecy it is simply a book that contains the rantings of an angry Jew who sees Nero as a great opponent or satan of his fellow jews.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero
The Sibylline Oracles, Book 5 and 8, written in the 2nd century, speak of Nero returning and bringing destruction. [191] Within Christian communities, these writings, along with others, [192] fueled the belief that Nero would return as the Antichrist. In 310, Lactantius wrote that Nero suddenly disappeared, and even the burial-place of that noxious wild beast was nowhere to be seen. This has led some persons of extravagant imagination to suppose that, having been conveyed to a distant region, he is still reserved alive; and to him they apply the Sibylline verses. [182]
In 422, Augustine of Hippo wrote about 2 Thessalonians 2:1–11, where he believed Paul mentioned the coming of the Antichrist. Though he rejects the theory, Augustine mentions that many Christians believed that Nero was the Antichrist or would return as the Antichrist. He wrote, so that in saying, "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work," [193] he alluded to Nero, whose deeds already seemed to be as the deeds of Antichrist. [161]
Some modern biblical scholars [194] [195] such as Delbert Hillers (Johns Hopkins University) of the American Schools of Oriental Research and the editors of the Oxford & Harper Collins Study Bibles, contend that the number 666 in the Book of Revelation is a code for Nero, [196] a view that is also supported in Roman Catholic Biblical commentaries. [197] [198]
Lastly the text that you show does not include the definitive article "the" which would be necessary if it meant the one and only opponent of God. Rather it says devil which means "opponent" or satan which also means "opponent". Translators should have translated and replaced the words devil and satan with opponent. If the text is referring to a "person" or "angel" it doesnt make sense to say
Revelation 20 - 2 He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the Fred, or Fred, and bound him for a thousand years.
where Fred is the Satan the devil.