Yerusalym:
I think you ought to do a little web research and start with google "The National Security Strategy of The United States of America"
Then tell me that Clinton was Unilateralist. It's true though that Clinton had a horrible foreign policy and it had very little strategy at all. Bush has declared that he will try to form ad hoc coalitions for various projects (wars) but if he can't get anyone to sign on he'll do what he wants when he wants to.
It isn't that those who sign on are really contributing anything significant except for PR. For PR the US will pay back with special financial rewards.
As for Nuclear Weapons. I say the US and Russia ought to give every country in the world a dozen. Then - everyone would have an even playing field.
Patrick Buchannan asked a good question a while back. He asked if "Sadaam is so dangerous why isn't Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia etc. carrying on a pre-emptive attack? The US seems to be more afraid of Sadaam than those in his immediate area.