.
proplog2
JoinedPosts by proplog2
-
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
50
Cult Fighters are short sighted fools
by proplog2 inthe anti-cultists are narrow minded and uninformed to say the least.. you see a lot of this here.
it is mostly a cover for irrational hatred.
most religions organized in a way that they expected their members to take their beliefs seriously.
-
proplog2
.
-
7
Scenario for Great Tribulation
by proplog2 income with me as we snoop on a secret meeting taking place at a. steambath outside st.petersburg -russia.
speakers:.
vladmir putin president of russia.
-
proplog2
.
-
12
Picking & Choosing Your "OUGHTS"
by proplog2 inthere is more evidence that all christians should engage in some.
foot washing ritual then there is that we shouldn't eat blood.
there is no wiggle room in john 13:14 "therefore, if i, although.
-
proplog2
.
-
10
..Proplog2..and..The WBT$ Rule,that Protects Pedophiles..
by OUTLAW inproplog2..just got back on the board and saw your pm to me..lol!
!..of course it`s not right to publicly post your pm to me..but..i find nothing wrong in publicly answering you..............you have made a big deal about the "wbt$ 2witness rule",dealing with child molesters..the rule that protects pedophiles!..you advocate this rule.you like this rule.you are willing to argue about how right this rule is,with anyone!................you have also publicly stated.that you have purposely kept the doors open in your own home,to keep your own children from molesting each other..what would you do if you caught them molesting each other?..you advocate the "wbt$ 2witness rule"..without 2witness`s,you advocate doing nothing..without 2witness`s,your willing to protect a pedophile........given the circumstances of how you say you conduct affairs in your own home..and..your absolute willingness to protect pedophiles with the "wbt$ 2witness rule"....your staunch advocation of the "wbt$ 2witness rule" comes under scrutiny.....so i ask:"do you feel you need the protection,the "wbt$ 2witness rule" would give you?
"..the rule that protects pedophiles!......it`s a simple question to answer.....the question is neither out of order,or harassment..you are the one that made all of this,"public knowledge"..and..went so far,as to "pm" me about it.....................................outlaw
-
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
proplog2
Avishai:
OK. You've made your diagnosis. Even a professional diagnosis in the area of "delusions" is influenced by the therapists own bias and personal views.
Nothing, I am suggesting is improbable. I personally believe I may be in error.
My primary target is the reorientation of Watchtower interpretation. My conclusions involve the disproving of Watchtower interpretations and then picking out the most likely of the remaining explanations. The only explanation that I don't consider is that the Bible writers were crazy. That wouldn't be an explanation - that would be explaining away - ending the possibility of deriving anything from prophecy.
Belief in an omnipotent/omniscient God is delusional. Some would even say that it is schizophrenia on a socio-cultural level.
Patient: I am a zombie
Therapist: How do you know
Patient: A zombie ought to know if he is a zombie
Therapist: (Takes a small blood testing lance and pricks patients finger)
Patient: Ouch! What did you do that for?
Therapist: See. You're bleeding. Zombies don't bleed because they are dead.
Patient: Well apparently some zombies bleed. -
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
proplog2
KW13: What a kind thing to say. I actually love fruit cake.
-
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
proplog2
Quietly leaveing:
I too have enjoyed my time on this forum. Truth is what can be defended. In the process of defending my ideas I have abandoned some ideas and others have been confirmed.
There are rules for good argumentation. Very few on here are good at it. They have no rebuttal and end up making wise cracks and personal attacks. I always make it clear to people that just want to ridicule that they aren't really addressing my arguments. If they persist I abandon the thread.
There is a certain culture here and I have seen it diverge from civility. Some of the most engaging and challenging individuals have seen this happen and have reduced their participation. I'm not talking about people who are JW apologists.
I would love to stay on here but - the returns are diminishing. -
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
proplog2
Avishai:
I have none of the symptoms of schizophrenia. No visions. No voices. Too old. Schizophrenia usually shows itself late teens early twenties. Sometimes it becomes evident in late 40's.
But my wife and grown kids and many intelligent friends find me normal and enjoy my company.
Even if I were schizophrenic that would have no bearing on the plausibility of the scenario I'm suggesting.
I take your concern for my welfare as veiled ridicule. -
27
Bush Pushes King of North
by proplog2 insouth.
north.
south's pushing there is no more said about the king of the south.
-
proplog2
Bump
I expect to leave JWD permanently within a few days.
I figured this thread is representative of what I have tried to say on this forum.
Some of these ideas may prove useful next month.