Posts by Nitty-Gritty

posted

17
That’s What Happens When You Leave the Truth.
by John Aquila in
1. jw
2. experiences
it never failed, when someone got disfellowshipped or left the organization, their life became shambles.

if married, a divorce ensued.

if the person had a great job, the company would lay-off or close.
Nitty-Gritty

It isn’t about a good life in the truth and bad life out of it. There are many faithful JWs who are poor, get cancer, suffer tragedies etc. And there are many who leave who go on to have a wonderful life.

It’s about choices. Regardless of what you all say, everyone has a choice. JWs choose to live their life with a regard for God and with what they believe are God’s requirements. Whether you want to call that being enslaved to a cult, that’s your prerogative, and your opinion, but JWs certainly don’t view it that way. We all (JW or X- JW) have the freedom to choose how we want to live our life.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@LoveUni Let me see if I've got this right. You, Nitty-Gritty, hope that a young man molested a child on one occasion.
You know exactly what I meant.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@Finkelstein Oh and to remind Nitty, the law courts in California are JW apostates.
Would that be Zalkin?
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@mf6
Nitty, would you make these same comments if the people involved were Catholic Priests? Or are you only defending the Watchtower?
You don't appear objective to me. Would you defend Catholic Priests this same way?
I sure would! However you are comparing apples to oranges. The discussion I was having was about a young man (teenager?) who had (I hope) molested someone one time. You are talking about adult "spiritual leaders" who have been grooming and molesting hundreds of boys in their care for years.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@sparrowdown

Nitty said: "Jehovah looks after the org."
Don't tell me, the result of this court proves that?
Was that your point all along?
No not really. I was making the point that that is why people wouldn't lie in the Candace case. Just to "protect" the org.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@listener
Wow Nitty Gritty, so on your logic we can assure ourselves that JWs are always telling the truth if it's not going to hurt them financially on a personal level. It also means that the individual JW doesn't care less about losing money for their organization.
Well you (or someone) was alluding to the elders and publishers lying. And I admitted that yes, it is possible that they would lie, however in this case, why would they? And yes, why would they lie to save the org money? After all Jehovah looks after the org. So wouldn't affect them, however lying would.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@listener
As I recall from the transcripts, several members of the Fremont cong. made testimonies and/or depositions. A few elders and some publishers. None of them would have to reach into their pockets and pay a dime, regardless of whether they lost or not.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@azor policy of calling headquarters for direction rather than calling the police shows that the orgs concern is not for the victims but rather their pocket books.
That does not make any sense at all. If it was their pocket books the headquarters were bothered about, then it would be in their interest to leave each congregation to make autonomous decisions. In that way, if bad decisions were made, the headquarters would hold no responsibility at all. Then Candace and others would be suing the elders and the congregations, not headquarters. And guess how much money they would be able to get from individuals and little congregations?
Sometimes I think that opposers have lost all their common sense and logical thinking on their journey out of the WT.
P.S. I repeat again, no one is stopping anyone from going to the police.
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@Listener how honest do you think the elders and JWs were throughout this case?
I am not saying a JW is not capable of lying, but in this case, no JW or elder had anything to lose by saying the truth, so why would they lie?
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
hot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.

but it's all quiet here.

are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
Nitty-Gritty

@LisaRose
but my feeling is that you don't risk innocent children, ever.
I think that is pretty much everyone's feeling, that's why when people accuse the elders of not caring, I find that hard to believe. With the same token I find it hard to believe that the JW org would deliberately put policies in place that would put children at risk.