Maybe not forty years ago.
If an adult rubbed up against another adult in a sexual manner one time. Here in some states it is considered a mild sex offense and could get someone,adult, marked for life as a number 1 sex offender. Children are more protected but some can be marked fir life for a one time occurrence.
Journalist writes about mild paedophile I believe they are referring to the type of offense. At any rate once again I feel like the writer like the WT slanted Dawkins interview for hype.
For Lurkers and Jehovahs Witnesses:
I am sure you think our heavy disagreements are awful. Please consider as a Jehovahs Witness that YOU can not speak your mind in constant fear of getting place on public or private reproof. Worse yet kicked out because of how you might offended someone.
My point and guess what! We can disagree and occasionally get by with some mudd slinging here!
Why because people have rights to disagree and move on! Without carrying grudges. Get over it with out elders interferring!
Your rights as a practicing Jehovah's Witnesses do not teach this concept.
Your taught to "love" anyone who disagrees! Shun them! Ignore them! They will go away! That is not reality!
This forum is a prime example that yes people diagree and some time sling mud but they can move on and be okay then write to each other in the NEXT topic. You will notice this by reading future topics!
I am sure some JW do not understand this yet! Sometimes Jehovahs Witnesses can learn just by the debates!
As far as Dawkins, I do not want to debate over his personal childhood experiences. I am sure he left his mark in the future college psychology books.