CC:
Did you see Oblivion? To me it had a very interesting storyline with an unexpected plot twist.
Take Care
greetings, movie buffs:.
i grew up with scary movies of the 1950s -- "the beast from 20,000 fathoms," "forbidden planet," "the thing" (howard hawkes).
in "the thing," the audience gasped when the men surrounding the ice-encased object proved to be circular: a flying saucer!
CC:
Did you see Oblivion? To me it had a very interesting storyline with an unexpected plot twist.
Take Care
january 2014 watchtower study article.
let your kingdom comebut when?.
this generation will not pass away.
Here is a range of renderings of Matthew 24:6 compared with Matthew 24:6 NWT:
Compare the rendering "terrified" in the NWT with the range of renderings in the BibleHub link above. (The word also occurs at Mk 13:7 - the parallel to Mt 24:6; and 2 Thess 2:2) Not that "terrified" is not a possible rendering, it is. But in modern english "terrified" falls at the upper range of the word's meaning. (AMG's dictionary defines it as, "To make a clamor, tumult. Used transitively, meaning to disturb, trouble, terrify."
The vast majority of the translations cited at the link use the term "alarmed" or troubled." Jesus is saying that these wars, etc should NOT "trouble" or "alarm" one into thinking that "the end" was immiment. IMO, the use of the term "terrify" seems to give the instruction a different character, as if to say, "Yes when you see these things, that should ring an alarm in you that the end is near, but keep your heads, as opposed to being "terrified."
january 2014 watchtower study article.
let your kingdom comebut when?.
this generation will not pass away.
Kaik:
Another thing I noticed in your comment: You appear to be confusing the term "kingdom" with "empire." At least that is what I'm getting from your comments above. As if to say, '"kingdom rising against kingdom" could only refer to entire empires going up against each other in war.
In 1st century usage, a kingdom could be as small as a city state, ruled over by a king. A verse which many commentators feel may be behind Jesus' comment in Mt 24:6-8 is Isaiah 19:2 -
Note that event though "kingdom against kingdom" is referred to, the context says that this is within the broader scope of "Egyptians against Egyptians." So that "kingdom against kingdom" in no way has to refer to only great empires (such as "Allied" versus "Axis" as in WWII) going against each other.
At any rate, take care.
january 2014 watchtower study article.
let your kingdom comebut when?.
this generation will not pass away.
Kaik:
The Olivet prophecy did not really fullfilled at 70AD. Look into that Mat 24:7
The context warns against taking these events as indicators of when "the end" will come. The disciples wanted to know "When?" And Jesus' initial answer is:
(Matthew 24:4-8 NWT) . . . “Look out that nobody misleads YOU; 5 for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will mislead many. 6 YOU are going to hear of wars and reports of wars; see that YOU are not terrified. For these things must take place, but the end is not yet. (nation, kingdoms against each other, famines, earthquakes, pestilences would occur) . . .All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.
So Jesus wasn't telling the disciples to look for a "fulfillment" of these events. Rather, he was telling them that they could expect to see events like these and not to let these type events (whether witnessed first hand or heard of from others), and which were fairly common in the human experience, to suddenly get them to thinking that 'this is it,' or to believe others claims that these type events were significant in connection with when the end would come.
That is not to say that there wouldn't be an "end" for the Jewish nation/temple, or a much later "parousia" for Jesus, but those events in vv. 4-8 would not be the event(s) that would indicate the "end" had arrived. According to Jesus, verse 15 was the foretold event that they were to watch for.
Commenting on Matthew 24:4-8 (which formed the initial answer to the disciples question of, "When will these things be"), the NICNT-Matthew commentary (pp. 901-02) offers this:
[End quote]
(As a side point, note also the '4 horsemen' section of Revelation 6. The 1st rider is crowned, the 2nd rider pictures war, the 3rd rider pictures famine conditions, the 4th rider picture death by war, famine, sickness, and wild beasts. But then in vv. 9-11 the executed "souls" ask 'when will justice take place.' They are not seeing the ride of the 4 horsemen as an indicator that "the end" is imminent.)
For the sake of brevity, I'll comment on Matthew 24:30/Luke 21:27 in another post.
Take care
my question is about 1 peter 1:11. the 1984 nwt omits the word "christ", beside spirit, although it occurs in the earliest manuscripts: .
11?they kept on investigating what particular season or what sort of [season] the spirit (the reference says: 2 sam 23:2 ) in them was indicating concerning christ (footnote says the spirit of christ which was in them indicated)... .
beside the word spirit, the reference quotes 2 sam 23:2, which says "the spirit of jehovah".
There is a close parallel to the phrase in Acts 16:7 (Cmp 1 Pet 1:11 with Acts 16:7)
my question is about 1 peter 1:11. the 1984 nwt omits the word "christ", beside spirit, although it occurs in the earliest manuscripts: .
11?they kept on investigating what particular season or what sort of [season] the spirit (the reference says: 2 sam 23:2 ) in them was indicating concerning christ (footnote says the spirit of christ which was in them indicated)... .
beside the word spirit, the reference quotes 2 sam 23:2, which says "the spirit of jehovah".
as bobcat post 1204 pointed out.
this seems to be a new form of ad type links.
i've seen them on other places.
NonJWSpouse:
Do you use Chrome?
if you could go back and utilize the knowledge of ttatt that you have now, how would it have impacted your decisions?.
for me, i would've made some different choices.
i now see that my depression over losing my position in the congregation and watching what i perceived to be my entire world fall apart around me, left me highly susceptible to influence.
Bruja:
Thank you very much.
I use Chrome. I checked the extensions and, sure enough, there was an extension called "RoboSaver." When I unchecked it the problem stopped. How it got to be installed I don't have the slightest idea.
Take Care
as bobcat post 1204 pointed out.
this seems to be a new form of ad type links.
i've seen them on other places.
Just to reiterate -
After the page loads, it auto refreshes and certain words will be underlined as a link. When the mouse flies over them a small ad window pops up inviting you to click on it. It looks like it looks for certain words - for example, on Jeremiah's thread the word "depression" is underlined and linked to a cite that offers depression remedies.
for the one who has died has been acquitted from his sin.
- romans 6:7 (nwt).
i got a chance to witness to my dad scripture for scripture for one whole hour over the holidays.
Perry:
Recently came across another verse that would argue that death does not wipe a person's "slate" clean:
(1 Peter 4:3-5) . . .For the time that has passed by is sufficient for YOU to have worked out the will of the nations when YOU proceeded in deeds of loose conduct, lusts, excesses with wine, revelries, drinking matches, and illegal idolatries. 4 Because YOU do not continue running with them in this course to the same low sink of debauchery, they are puzzled and go on speaking abusively of YOU. 5 But these people will render an account to the one ready to judge those living and those dead.
Verse 5 says the ones practicing the things in verse 3 would eventually "render an account," which they wouldn't have to if death wipes a person's slate clean. Those who would render an account include, according to Peter, "those living and those dead."
Take care