Crazyguy:
I remember a situation in our hall (it was a few years back when I was an elder), an elderly sister went into the hospital because she was sick and her blood count was dropping. The HLC talked them into trying hemopure (I think that was what it was - it was made of bovine blood at the time) but the sister adamantly refused. As far as she was concerned it had blood in it so it was out of the question. My position with the sister (who I had been visiting at the hospital) was to support whatever decision she chose.
I remember an HLC brother calling me an expressing exasperation with the sister for being unwilling to take the stuff. Eventually another elder talked her into taking it.
The things that stood out for me at the time was the fact that the sister's conscientous stand meant nothing to these brothers. Supposedly these kind of things fall into a grey area that we are to decide individually based on our conscience. (That is the company line at least.) But the HLC and some of the other elders (probably taking the same view as the HLC) saw it as their job to change this sister's viewpoint.
This was probably one of the early things that were starting my wake-up. (I see no problem with blood now, but at the time what stood out was the trampling on the sister's conscience.)
I remember someone else on here saying that their CO took the position that you should be agreeable to the allowable fractions unless you could come up with a very good reason not to. (This may not be the exact thread but it has the idea I was expressing.)
Bobcat