just had jws over.
one of them (been in all of about 4 years) said "you can be sure no true christians have died due to famine" like therefore it didn't matter who did - i thought i was going to throw up... i told him that was an evil thing to say and out came the bible about the lillies of the field and manna in the desert.. .
ugh.
Glitter
Did he call himself Graham, the JW? Mmmmmm you say he's been in for about 4 years.
I guess he is saying a normal WT twisted thinking thing!......... No true Christian as ever starved. "True" being the catch in that if some who supposed to be a true Christian starved then- they could not have been true Christians in the first place! Get what I mean ?
Qwerty
there is only so far you can go in inflicting just punishment upon an evil person.
yet how evil is someone who has murdered one person in cold blood, compared to someone who is guilty of genocide?
the crime of murder is heinous in itself, but does the fact that someone may be responsible for millions of deaths make the crime of multiple murder a million times worse than the person who kills only once?
No they should not kill him, that will only make him a Martyr I would think!
my sister...... is a psycho!!!!.
she's "in feild service" sending out letters to people that didn't answer at the door.
(which is already a little too much) she dressed up in her meeting cloths, head to foot, in order to be presentable while she is writing those letters.
She prob gets dress up so she san properly tell herself she is not getting out of door knocking, that it is the same!
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0628042teach1.html
that is a link to the smoking gun.
the entire story is there.i read the arrest report.
SheilaM
Yep agree.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0628042teach1.html
that is a link to the smoking gun.
the entire story is there.i read the arrest report.
Edited....... Beer talkin!!!!!!!!!!
righto, folks!, .
i've been asked a few times about how people will be fed.
orally, of course!
Mr.Eman
So anyone under 35 are not allowed an beer?
So, everyone who comes to our virtual KH will enjoy a few beers with the elders (that's anyone over 35).
GREAT MORE BEER FOR US THEN!
Valis....... Right that's you in for Friday night?!!!!! Good stuff.
Anyone else?
Qwerty
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0628042teach1.html
that is a link to the smoking gun.
the entire story is there.i read the arrest report.
JWbot.
Yep! If I was that boy I would have let nature take it's course!
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0628042teach1.html
that is a link to the smoking gun.
the entire story is there.i read the arrest report.
CHEV........... I agree
I do agree that there is a difference between men and women regarding the sexual issue. But regardless children are still children and I hate to see a child lose their innocence too early, especially at the hands of an adult. I understand children experiment with one another, its a natural thing, it's natural to experiment with kids your own age. Never should a child experiment with a grow f-n adult, then it's not experimenting,it's being taken advantage of.
But..................
My nephew is 13 and he and I are very close. I'm proud to say he is still relatively innocent, even though he certainly doesnt look 13, the kid is nearly 6 feet tall, I could never see him doing such a thing, and I'd be pissed if an older woman tried to pull such a thing with him.
You could never see him doing such a thing and he also! BUT when hormones take over then who knows!!!!!! Hormones on his part and lust on the adults females part. Qwerty
i have read a lot of threads on here about 607 b.c.e.
and i find a lot of them confusing.. i'm not an idiot but neither am i that well versed in star charts and archeological finds and some of the threads here (that i've found) have left me even more confused as they often make reference to things i know nothing about.. does anyone out there know where i can find an easy to read and understand explanation of 607.. am i to understand that it's the bible that comes to the date 607 and no other secular evidence can be found?.
i'm not having a go at any of the threads here as i'm sure they are excellent threads, they just go right over the top of my head.. i can't get any access to books or anything like that due to home circumstances so anything online would be perfect.. i would be grateful for any help anyone can give me.. thanks.
Hi Laurelin
I know what you mean it is confusing!
Try a my friend Uncleonions web site......... if I can remember it, not used it for ages.
You going to Englishmans BBQ in Weston Super Mare?
Bye - Qwerty
in jan 1962, the wt published a questions from readers about what was and wasn't acceptable in the sack for married couples.
the article contained a paragraph, that to us teenagers, seemed to say that prayer for forgiveness for non-marrieds was sufficient if you hadn't gone "all the way" and just engaged in sexual activity that stopped a whisker short of actual intercourse.
here's the paragraph:.
Yep JeffT
You can see how their writings have changed over the years.
Qwerty
