shepherdless

Joined

• started 16 topics
• posted 914 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by shepherdless

• 
  19

  marriage"equality" survey, Australia.

  by zeb in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the australian govt has set out a survey to see if people are in favour of changing the marriage act to include same sex couples.. hm here have received their papers?

  the survey promises to be anonymous but has a substantial bar code at the bottom... anonymous yeah right.. the marriage act once said "two people" then a previous prime minister changed it to say "man and woman" all that is needed to amend this situation as required by the gay community is change it back again to "two people" there, done and dusted.. and millions of dollars need not be wasted on this survey which is not compulsory as is voting in australia.

  can anyone here who still goes to kh tell us if this has had a ruling from the platform?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  You have to be on the electoral roll to "vote" in this survey. A lot of JWs are not on the electoral roll.

  For what it is worth, it sounds like no direction on whether or not it is permissible to "vote" has been given at my wife's Kingdom Hall.
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Really, more required to make a web page than print and ship hard (physical) literature? I’ll let you think about that position for a while before i bother responding.

  I never said they were "required". In fact I can't work out why there are so many bethelites, or what they do.
  
  
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Hi Sparky, I am fairly sure that the origins of sbf's comments on the money earnt go back to the following old thread:

  https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/5260919340793856/bcg-matrix-jw-org-production-model

  At least that is how I understood it. I think sbf mis-remembered the relevant date period (it was early 80s, not 1970/80s). I mis-remembered it myself, as 1985, and as $2mil per week, not $1.7 mil per week.

  Morpheus, as long as it was properly managed, it can't have been zero profit. We were getting 100 page broadsheet newspapers delivered to our door for around that price, at around that time, and the newspapers were seen as profitable.

  Another way to look at it is that even if you argue that those bethelites working under sweatshop conditions were only making the Borg $100 million p.a. revenue (1980s $) back then, now you have even more bethelites producing a website that earns the Borg diddly squat.
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  yes, LV101, it seems to be a high volume low margin business. Lots of newspaper and magazine publishers used to make a lot of money from a lot of individuals' small change. Not so, these days.
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Question for Sparky:

  lets say of the 11,150,000 Watchtowers of 1 Jan 1985, half were sold by subscription, and half by door to door or paid for by JWs themselves.

  11150000 x (0.16 + 0.2)/2 = $2,007,000 or about $2 million revenue?

  Also, didn't Awake sell almost as many copies per edition?

  Aren't we getting close to $2 million per week revenue, without including the sale of books, or am I missing something?
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Just in response to Sparky, I recall reading that Watchtower was making about $2 million per week in 1985. I don't know the circulation of around that time, so I don't know if that is plausible.
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Its always made its money selling hope and dreams of panda petting paradise to people. Books were just the vehicle to do that.

  For most of its history, it made the bulk of its money selling magazines (and in the early days, books) to members of the public, not so much its own members. I think one of the Studies in The Scriptures books was the third highest selling book of all time, at one stage long ago (the bible holding the no 1 spot).

  Hell most religions have sold nothing since their inception and have done very well.

  Other religions tithe. If you count elders as clergy, Watchtower has a much higher ratio of clergy to adherents than other religions. Other religions do have businesses. SDA has food companies, nursing homes, a University, and goodness knows what else. Catholics have huge property portfolios, schools, hospitals, hospices etc. Other religions are far less micromanaging. Watchtower has to come up with a new "church" service twice a week, whereas Catholics, for example, give the identical church service every 3 years. And to top it off, many Christian religions are starting to struggle.
  
  
• 
  192

  Question for SBF

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  slimboyfat, it appears that wts is going, gone digital.

  can you show your view what is wts next move after they are completely gone from kings county and settled in warwick?

  - this thread is your if you want it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  I am mostly in agreement with sbf on this, except I do not think they are close to a financial collapse as yet. Limited financial info, such as the UK accounts, suggest (in the U.K. at least) there are still investments being held by the Borg, although these have decreased. Further, I doubt that the Borg has significant external debt, and I haven't seen any evidence otherwise. Most sudden and outwardly unexpected financial collapses (but not all) involve a significant amount of external debt.

  I suspect they are making losses, and this is using up their reserves, but there is a while to go, yet.

  One question I don't think anyone has addressed in detail, is what would a "financial collapse" look like. For a religious institution with no significant debt, there might be little to see. There might not be any sudden default. I would have thought it would be more of the same as we see now; more asset sales and bethel layoffs, and only very core activities continuing. Not an actual collapse; more of a "financial fade".

  It is not as if JWs are going to wake up one morning and find they have been merged with, eg, the Mormons. I think the average JW won't notice much change, in a "financial fade", apart from less micromanaging from Borg Central. I think it would mostly affect bethelites and various others feeding off the teat of the Borg. The GB might get a shakeup, or even replaced, and many senior managers will go, but the Borg would probably continue on, with whatever donation income is available.
• 
  8

  Coping With Parents' Becoming Jehovah's Witnesses

  by DNCall in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  my sister recently wrote a short piece on the impact of our parents' becoming jehovah's witnesses in the 1950s.

  she was a teenager at the time.

  what is so striking and disturbing is that the same predicament faces so many teenagers to this day.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Awesome, and sad at the same time. I admire your sister's strength of character, in adversity.
• 
  5

  Do you have a dumb politician like Sara Hansen Young in your country?

  by barry in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  we have one in australia and there is even a song about her.

  i would like to know if you have someone like this among your politicians.https://youtu.be/bdwxpwl89sk.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shepherdless

  Perhaps a bit of background for others. This young Australian Greens senator (in my view) comes across like an angry left wing Uni student. She is a little out of place, in a party that seems to be trying to become more mainstream. She used to be her party's spokesperson on all matters relating to immigration and boat people, which was an intense political issue. Back then, the Greens were the only significant party that was advocating letting all boat people arrive, and even rescuing them in their attempts.

  About 3 or 4 years ago, there was a Senate committee where the military and the customs and border protection department were being grilled. Her questions as a senator revealed that she thought the fictional tv series, Sea Patrol, was some sort of real life reality show.

  In relation to the "she only got 200 primary votes", it should be pointed out that these days, there are very few primary votes cast for senators. When voting for the senate, Australians can either number all the available candidates in order (from one to about 100) or simply vote "above the line" which means voting for a party and having preferences distributed as directed by that party. Most people can't be bothered and just vote "above the line".