responding to a question above:
are you saying the standard model is not tested beyond reasonable doubt, or are you saying it does not matter in physics if there is reasonable doubt about.a theory???
The standard model of particle physics has not been proven "beyond reasonable doubt". In fact, its inability to explain, for example, "dark matter" is a puzzle, not yet solved. It does matter in physics if there is a reasonable doubt about a theory. The thing about physics, (and the scientific method of discovery in general), is that you never assume to know anything with absolute 100% certainty. Dogma is not allowed.
neither of these things makes much sense to me
True or false: the standard model has been tested beyond reasonable doubt?
To repeat myself, the standard model has not been tested beyond reasonable doubt. The existence of the Higgs bosun has been proved to a level that I think any sensible person would consider beyond reasonable doubt. However, that does not necessarily prove the underlying theory that predicted its discovery. Can you see the difference?
On the other hand, the theory of evolution has i.m.o. been overwhelmingly proved, with overwhelming amounts of evidence from separate and unrelated fields of science.
Sorry to sidetrack the thread, by the way.