a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
“I'm still curious. Can you give us the title, author, and ISBN number of one of those books that is "about evolution" but "not about biological evolution"?
I'm trying to work out what "non-biological evolution" is, and maybe that book can help.”
FFghost One example is Darwin’s first theory as I talked about earlier.
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty this is absolutely twisting things “I asked you how you arrived at your rejection of biological evolution and you volunteered the fact that you had never read a single book on the subject because they are all 'long and complicated'. How am I twisting things exactly?”
I said if something is true it shouldn’t need an overly complex convoluted bullshit baffles brains book written about it. Not that it was too long and complicated for me to read. You totally twisted what I said.
You also twisted things saying I rejected chance theory as the origin of the universe when I have said time and time again I’m agnostic
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Many in my congregation are now PZMI. Physically zoom and mentally in 🤣
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
As I’ve said many times I haven’t read any specific books that are about biological evolution but I’ve read lots of other books about evolution. But you keep being very childish and twisting things? Do you think this makes you look like a mature level headed individual?
Getting back to the topic of this thread cofty may be an example of what we are talking about here. Maybe not as happy and content but feeling very aggressive in keeping their beliefs that they are so sure they have found the truth?
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
I’m always very wary of anyone who is absolutely certain they have the entire truth about evolution or creation.
Im even more wary of individuals who claim to be better than everyone else at something “ I could present the case for creationism and Intelligent Design better than anybody here. ” Cofty
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
As you know full well I never said any like that you are using the straw man technique 🤣
I have not read your specific books on biological evolution but as I have said I have read many scientific books on both sides. And as I’ve said many times whenever you try this straw man strategy, I do read a lot of books on many different subjects not just the ones that feed my confirmation bias. You should try it.
You really do make yourself sound stupid and vindictive and very childish when you try to take part of something I said out of context and twist it.
You don’t do yourself any favours if you want to come across as a level headed individual
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty you seem very easily triggered. That was not my intention at all.
But my intention is to try to get you to use critical thinking and perhaps for once try to think outside the box.
Read books on both sides and think for yourself.
not just the books that feed your confirmation bias.
Start with Darwin’s first theory then have a think about all the theories
and always keep in mind the possibility that they could be wrong
let’s not be childish
after years of speculation, jw movie star & chorus member nicolas king, who ironically starred as the bad guy espousing homosexuality in a jw movie, has coupled up with his performing partner and also performed in a church for pride month.. .
.
.
It’s so ironic that his character in the JW propaganda film was pro Gay and made to look like the baddie
i wonder back then was he sleeping with men?
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
The argument about how amazing DNA is and how it can be traced right back is sometimes used by evolutionists as an argument for chance and also used by the intelligent design crowd.
Sometime the more amazing we discover that biology is the more in the intelligent Design crowd say this proves it couldn’t be chance.
Some new scientists now say it had to have intelligence behind but the old school still believe Darwin’s theories or new updated theories.
A good book to read is Darwin’s first theory by Rob Wesson to really get you thinking.
Rob Wesson is a geologist. To quote him “ I’ve spent a career studying earthquakes. I’ve earned my living puzzling about them. They fascinate me. I’m an earthquake guy. But it’s not just earthquakes. It’s mountains and glaciers and volcanoes and floods and sea level and climate. I am captivated by the way the earth changes. How it’s changed in the past and how it will change in the future. And, in truth, it’s not only geology. It’s how Homo sapiens deals with these changes in particular.”
Excerpt From
Darwin's First Theory
Rob Wesson
https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewBook?id=0
This material may be protected by copyright.
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
“think it is much harder to prove god exists than to prove he doesnt. What is the criteria that would prove god exists?“
Im talking about intelligence vs chance as the start
