a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty “ What biologists deny common ancestry - ones that aren't fundamentalist xtians that is?
There are not two conflicting sides in the scientific question of the common ancestry of all living things,”
The two groups that can’t agree are those that think common ancestry proves intelligence and those that think it proves chance?
How can you not see this?
The more scientific discoveries there are some say this is proof of intelligence and some old school say see this is proof of chance
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
SB what are you talking about those subjects never rely on bullshit baffles brain’s techniques. They can be logical, clear and concise and not rely on people having faith to believe they are true.
If something is true it doesn’t need over complex convoluted points that can be argued against.
chemistry, calculus and any other deep subjects can be explained in clear concise ways that won’t have two groups of scientists having different views.
A surprising number of scientists who discover just how amazing chemistry, biology etc are become convinced that there must have been design not chance. But still many scientists discovering the same things conclude it was chance
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
I hope you are not going to keep asking me “have you read one book on flat earth, just one” because I really don’t want to waste my time.
goodbye Cofty I haven’t got any more time for you and your funny beliefs
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty “You are tying yourself in knots to avoid admitting your deception.”
How could my beliefs be deception when I have said time and time again that I am agnostic?
You seem to think that agnostics deny chance theory? This is simply not true. We just haven’t yet found absolute proof of chance yet, all evidence so far can also be used to point towards intelligence having been involved. Hence why I’m agnostic.
Please don’t think I’m attacking your beliefs I certainly am not trying to force my beliefs on you and I hope you will give me the same respect
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
I think it is you who are tying yourself up in knots
I do understand it to an extent with your past beliefs
I think you will eventually come to the realisation that you will never know the entire truth about this as I have.
I am comfortable knowing that anyone who claims to know the truth about the origin of the universe is probably wrong
And that what you are so sure about at present may not be as clear cut as you think now
all the best in your journey
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
“Okay tell me even one book you have studied on evolutionary biology. Even one. Doesn't have to be complicated one.”
Cofty as I have said many times I don’t remember one of the many books I read based on one of Darwin’s chance theorists that said in the blurb “this book covers biological evolution”
they all just say evolution
I don’t know why you put so much emphasis on a book that has to come under specialist biological evolution. There are many good books on evolution that don’t specifically say that.
There are so many theories now of chance as the origin. One theory even supposed that the universe created itself. I don’t know if this comes under chance or intelligently designed 🤣
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty “Stop being so silly SB. You are determined to strawman anybody who doesn't share your myths.”
Fixed that for you
“Stop being so silly Cofty You are determined to strawman anybody who doesn't share your myths.”
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
“I'm still curious. Can you give us the title, author, and ISBN number of one of those books that is "about evolution" but "not about biological evolution"?
I'm trying to work out what "non-biological evolution" is, and maybe that book can help.”
FFghost One example is Darwin’s first theory as I talked about earlier.
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Cofty this is absolutely twisting things “I asked you how you arrived at your rejection of biological evolution and you volunteered the fact that you had never read a single book on the subject because they are all 'long and complicated'. How am I twisting things exactly?”
I said if something is true it shouldn’t need an overly complex convoluted bullshit baffles brains book written about it. Not that it was too long and complicated for me to read. You totally twisted what I said.
You also twisted things saying I rejected chance theory as the origin of the universe when I have said time and time again I’m agnostic
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
Many in my congregation are now PZMI. Physically zoom and mentally in 🤣
